On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> What about 0 - ptr? (ok, that's even more weird)
>
>
> * match.pd (0-ptr): New transformation.
>
> Regtested on gcc112.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> --
> Marc Glisse
> Index: gcc/match.pd
>
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
What about 0 - ptr? (ok, that's even more weird)
* match.pd (0-ptr): New transformation.
Regtested on gcc112.
--
Marc GlisseIndex: gcc/match.pd
===
--- gcc/match.pd (revision 2
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
I hadn't implemented this simplification because I think it is invalid code,
but apparently people do write it, so we might as well handle it sensibly.
This also happens to work around PR 831
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hadn't implemented this simplification because I think it is invalid code,
> but apparently people do write it, so we might as well handle it sensibly.
> This also happens to work around PR 83104 (already fixed).
>
> bootstrap+regt
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:34:08PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
I hadn't implemented this simplification because I think it is invalid code,
but apparently people do write it, so we might as well handle it sensibly.
This also happens to work around
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 06:34:08PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hadn't implemented this simplification because I think it is invalid code,
> but apparently people do write it, so we might as well handle it sensibly.
> This also happens to work around PR 83104 (already fixed).
>
> boot
Hello,
I hadn't implemented this simplification because I think it is invalid
code, but apparently people do write it, so we might as well handle it
sensibly. This also happens to work around PR 83104 (already fixed).
bootstrap+regtest on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
2017-11-22 Marc Gliss
