On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Denis Chertykov wrote:
>> The avr section currently has this:
>>
>> We @emph{strongly} recommend using binutils 2.13 or newer.
>>
>> Okay to yank it?
> We can remove this line.
Done thusly, thank you.
Gerald
2017-03-13 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/install.texi (Specifi
2017-03-12 15:32 GMT+04:00 Gerald Pfeifer :
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed:
>>
>> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
>> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
>> Let me
> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:47:42 +0100
> From: Gerald Pfeifer
> (May there be further changes to consider for cris-*?)
Nothing actively pursued and no news on related issues.
brgds, H-P
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 7:38 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Moore, Catherine
> ; Matthew Fortune
>
> Subject: install.texi and mips-*-* (was: Target maintainers: doc/install.texi
>
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Certainly! Thanks.
Done thusly; thanks for the quick response, H-P.
(May there be further changes to consider for cris-*?)
Gerald
2017-03-12 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/install.texi (Specific) : No longer
refer to binutils 2.11/2.1
> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:34:25 +0100 (CET)
> From: Gerald Pfeifer
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> > binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> > Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions
> around that.
The section on sparc-*-linux* currently has this:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions
> around that.
The mips-*-* currently has this:
The assembler
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions
> around that.
The i?86-*-linux* section currently has this:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions
> around that.
The cris-axis-elf / cris-axis-linux-gnu section c
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed:
>
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestio
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed:
>
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestio
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed:
>
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestio
13 matches
Mail list logo
