> Sadly, that showed a performance-regression; from 5227456 cycles
> (with cc0) to 5238564 (CC_REG). I'll add a note about this
> 0.21% regression to pr93372 and hope to fix it soon.
IIRC in a few cases the old way of eliminating redundant compares would find
one more occurrence because the dbr
Not that anyone would notice, except a few maintainers of
targets with delay-slots, and only if the first patch causes
fallout, as the others only touch stuff related to the CRIS target.
The 23 commits have been posted previously, around Jan-Feb. For
reference:
2c2d405 dbr: Filter-out TARGET_FLA
