[ada, build] Link gnattools with $(LIBINTL)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01443.html
This needs a build and/or Ada maintainer. I guess this is obvious,
though.
Can you clarify how LIBINTL is set, and to what value? Will it be empty
when not needed?
Arno
Arnaud,
[ada, build] Link gnattools with $(LIBINTL)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01443.html
This needs a build and/or Ada maintainer. I guess this is obvious,
though.
Can you clarify how LIBINTL is set, and to what value? Will it be empty
when not needed?
[ada, build] Link gnattools with $(LIBINTL)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01443.html
This needs a build and/or Ada maintainer. I guess this is obvious,
though.
Can you clarify how LIBINTL is set, and to what value? Will it be empty
when not
On 06/27/2011 01:32 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
This needs the mudflap maintainer.
Build changes are okay, the rest is pretty obvious.
For pass-stratcliff I'd rather use
Paolo,
On 06/27/2011 01:32 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
This needs the mudflap maintainer.
Build changes are okay, the rest is pretty obvious.
For pass-stratcliff I'd
The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
This needs at least a build and/or libgcc maintainer, though a global
reviewer might be helpful. I'm not Cc'ing the
Hi -
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:32:30PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
[...]
Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
- FChE
Hi Frank,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:32:30PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
[...]
Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
Could you also comment on the open
Hi -
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
Could you also comment on the open questions in the submission so
mudflap support on Solaris can be improved further?
Sure. Transcribing:
One generic issue came
Hi Rainer,
On 27 Jun 2011, at 12:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
This needs at least a build and/or libgcc maintainer,
Hi Frank,
Support libmudflap on Solaris (PR libmudflap/38738)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01446.html
Looks good to me, thanks for taking a look at the area.
I've installed the patch as it, since it at least fixes the libmudflap
build on Solaris.
Thanks.
Hi Frank,
Sure. Transcribing:
One generic issue came up with the port: enabling or disabling
libmudflap depends on a factor (linker support for --wrap/-z wrap)
that is best checked dynamically, thus doesn't really seem to belong
at the toplevel. Is there any precedent for performing such
Hi Iain,
The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
This needs at least a build and/or libgcc maintainer, though a global
reviewer might be helpful. I'm not
On Jun 27, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
On 27 Jun 2011, at 12:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
The following three patches have remained unreviewed for a week:
[build] Move unwinder to toplevel libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01452.html
As far as Darwin is
14 matches
Mail list logo
