Re: User-define literals for std::complex.

2013-10-22 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 20 October 2013 22:18, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: On 09/27/2013 05:39 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 27 September 2013 05:17, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: The complex user-defined literals finally passed (n3779) with the resolution to DR1473 allowing the suffix id to touch the quotes (Can't find

Re: User-define literals for std::complex.

2013-10-20 Thread Ed Smith-Rowland
On 09/27/2013 05:39 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 27 September 2013 05:17, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: The complex user-defined literals finally passed (n3779) with the resolution to DR1473 allowing the suffix id to touch the quotes (Can't find it but I put it in not too long ago). I think it's

Re: User-define literals for std::complex.

2013-09-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 27 September 2013 05:17, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote: The complex user-defined literals finally passed (n3779) with the resolution to DR1473 allowing the suffix id to touch the quotes (Can't find it but I put it in not too long ago). I think it's been approved by the LWG and looks like it will

User-define literals for std::complex.

2013-09-26 Thread Ed Smith-Rowland
Greetings, The complex user-defined literals finally passed (n3779) with the resolution to DR1473 allowing the suffix id to touch the quotes (Can't find it but I put it in not too long ago). (http://wiki.edg.com/twiki/pub/Wg21chicago2013/LibraryWorkingGroup/N3779-complex_literals.pdf)