On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:51 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> When SECTION_RETAIN is used, definitions marked with used attribute and
> unmarked definitions are placed in a section with the same name. Instead
> of issue an error:
>
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-2 gcc]$ /usr/gcc-11.0.0-x32/bin/gcc -S c.c
> -fdiagnostics-pl
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:14 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> I tested it with glibc build. Glibc build issue is the reason I
> didn't combine 2 patches into one.
> If GCC does issue a warning, which it should, we will change glibc.
>
OK. Thanks. Then I won't worry about this glibc for now.
Jim
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:08 PM Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:51 AM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> When SECTION_RETAIN is used, definitions marked with used attribute and
>> unmarked definitions are placed in a section with the same name. Instead
>> of issue an error:
>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 4:51 AM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> When SECTION_RETAIN is used, definitions marked with used attribute and
> unmarked definitions are placed in a section with the same name. Instead
> of issue an error:
>
Have you tested glibc builds with t
When SECTION_RETAIN is used, definitions marked with used attribute and
unmarked definitions are placed in a section with the same name. Instead
of issue an error:
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 gcc]$ /usr/gcc-11.0.0-x32/bin/gcc -S c.c
-fdiagnostics-plain-output
c.c:2:49: error: ‘foo1’ causes a section type con
