On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please
CC me on any problems that
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't that mean that a non-GCC host compiler might fail to build
4.8 during stage1?
Yes. Fixed last week. vec needed to become a pure POD. So sad.
Diego.
Diego Novillo wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I have tested the patch pretty extensively:
- Regular bootstraps on x86_64, ppc, ia64, sparc and hppa.
- Bootstraps with --enable-checking=release
- Bootstraps with --enable-checking=gc,gcac
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is AIX stdlib.h defines
#define vec_free free
Ouch.
I am not sure where
#undef vec_free
should be placed. In vec.h or
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:15:22AM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have now committed all 25
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:57:08PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:15:22AM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com
wrote:
On Sat,
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please
CC me on any problems that you think may be related to this rewrite.
That seems to have trigged some bug in gcc-4.4-era. See
PR55381. There are a lot of suspicious warnings from
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please
CC me on any problems that you think may be related to this rewrite.
That seems to have trigged some
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
My cris-elf builds worked fine, but config-list.mk only builds stage
1, it does not build libgfortran. Can you give me instructions on how
to build your target on my x86 workstation?
Better see the PR for cc1 command-line and preprocessed C-file.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
My cris-elf builds worked fine, but config-list.mk only builds stage
1, it does not build libgfortran. Can you give me instructions on how
to build your target on my x86
On 18.11.12 18:05, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please
CC me on any problems that you think may be related to this rewrite.
That seems to have trigged some bug in gcc-4.4-era. See
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Is there a minimum gcc to bootstrap current trunk?
I currently fail to bootstrap trunk with a 4.2.1 gcc, but a 4.6
succeeds.
A gcc-4.1.2 has worked for me in the past, before this recent
vec.h change. I think that's the minimum version reportedly
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@bitrange.com
wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please
CC me on any problems that
On 18.11.12 20:11, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Is there a minimum gcc to bootstrap current trunk?
I currently fail to bootstrap trunk with a 4.2.1 gcc, but a 4.6
succeeds.
A gcc-4.1.2 has worked for me in the past, before this recent
vec.h change.
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 18.11.12 20:11, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Andreas Tobler wrote:
Is there a minimum gcc to bootstrap current trunk?
I currently fail to bootstrap trunk with a 4.2.1 gcc, but a 4.6
succeeds.
A gcc-4.1.2 has worked for
Files were changed in gcc/c-family with no associated ChangeLog entry.
And now bootstrap fails on AIX using GCC 4.6.3 with the error:
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c: In function 'c_fileinfo*
get_fileinfo(const char*)':
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c:107:39: error:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 4:28 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
Files were changed in gcc/c-family with no associated ChangeLog entry.
*gasp*
I mistakenly put them in c/ChangeLog. Not that they carry any useful
information, but I'll move them.
And now bootstrap fails on AIX using
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
And now bootstrap fails on AIX using GCC 4.6.3 with the error:
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c: In function 'c_fileinfo*
get_fileinfo(const char*)':
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c:107:39: error:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is AIX stdlib.h defines
#define vec_free free
Ouch.
I am not sure where
#undef vec_free
should be placed. In vec.h or system.h?
I think system.h.
Ian
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
I have tested the patch pretty extensively:
- Regular bootstraps on x86_64, ppc, ia64, sparc and hppa.
- Bootstraps with --enable-checking=release
- Bootstraps with --enable-checking=gc,gcac
- Basic builds on all
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com wrote:
Was this considered?
Yup. I just did not implement it. Would be a good follow up, though.
Diego.
On 16-11-2012 12:13, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Pedro Alves pal...@redhat.com wrote:
Was this considered?
Yup. I just did not implement it. Would be a good follow up, though.
Ah, good to know. Thanks.
For the archives, cause gcc-patches@ bounced my mail for
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
2012-11-15 Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com
* vec.c (register_overhead): Convert it into
member function of vec_prefix.
(release_overhead): Likewise.
(calculate_allocation):
I have split the VEC rewrite into 25 patches. The only patches that
make actual changes are #1 (vec.c and vec.h) and #2 (gengtype). All
the others are mechanical side-effects from the first patch.
I will still appreciate if maintainers can take a look at the other
patches to make sure I have
24 matches
Mail list logo
