Re: bitmap fix for current

2014-11-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote: On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/13/14 12:37, Mike Stump wrote: I was doing a merge, and it failed to

Re: bitmap fix for current

2014-11-19 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 14, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Richard Biener richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/13/14 12:37, Mike Stump wrote: I was doing a merge, and it failed to even compile the runtime libraries due to checking in bitmap. bitmap goes

Re: bitmap fix for current

2014-11-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/13/14 12:37, Mike Stump wrote: I was doing a merge, and it failed to even compile the runtime libraries due to checking in bitmap. bitmap goes to remove set bits from the bitmap (the second hunk in a two hunk set), and it

bitmap fix for current

2014-11-13 Thread Mike Stump
I was doing a merge, and it failed to even compile the runtime libraries due to checking in bitmap. bitmap goes to remove set bits from the bitmap (the second hunk in a two hunk set), and it fails to update the current pointer. That memory is freed and then reallocated and a new index is put

Re: bitmap fix for current

2014-11-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/13/14 12:37, Mike Stump wrote: I was doing a merge, and it failed to even compile the runtime libraries due to checking in bitmap. bitmap goes to remove set bits from the bitmap (the second hunk in a two hunk set), and it fails to update the current pointer. That memory is freed and then