Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-06-11 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 23:41 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 26, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > On May 19, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > Allowing a missing executable name is reasonable enough, but I was > > > actually thinking that the messages should print "gcc" or whatever > >

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-06-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 26, 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On May 19, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: >> Allowing a missing executable name is reasonable enough, but I was >> actually thinking that the messages should print "gcc" or whatever command >> the user ran in place of "collect2". > Should we make the

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-05-25 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On May 19, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> > I don't think the error should mention .exe, but I also don't think the >> > error should mention collect2 (see what I said in >> > , the existence

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-05-19 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 19 May 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > I don't think the error should mention .exe, but I also don't think the > > error should mention collect2 (see what I said in > > , the existence > > of collect2 is an implementation

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-05-19 Thread Alexandre Oliva
Hello, Joseph, Andrew, Thanks for your feedback. On Feb 28, 2020, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> I'm not sure it's appropriate for the error to not omit the host >> platform's executable suffix, just as it omits directory components from >> argv[0], so

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-02-28 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > I'm not sure it's appropriate for the error to not omit the host > platform's executable suffix, just as it omits directory components from > argv[0], so I'm undecided between fixing collect2.c's initialization of > progname or extending the regexp,

Re: collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-02-27 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:17 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > > Testing on platforms with an executable suffix gets a few excess output > failures because e.g. collect2.exe errors do not get pruned. > > I'm not sure it's appropriate for the error to not omit the host > platform's executable suffix,

collect2.exe errors not pruned

2020-02-27 Thread Alexandre Oliva
Testing on platforms with an executable suffix gets a few excess output failures because e.g. collect2.exe errors do not get pruned. I'm not sure it's appropriate for the error to not omit the host platform's executable suffix, just as it omits directory components from argv[0], so I'm