On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
I don't think it's any good or clearer to understand.
Hi Richi, I had forgotten I prepared this for PR #19832, maybe you want to
take a look. FWIW, with my patch applied there is a difference of
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
I don't think it's any good or clearer to understand.
Hi Richi, I had forgotten I prepared this for PR #19832, maybe you want to
take a look. FWIW, with my patch applied there is a difference of ~3 M
instr, which is almost unmeasurable in time.
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Hey Dimitrios,
I can't say much about your patch, so I am CC-ing the maintainers.
I don't think it's any good or clearer to understand.
Richard.
Thanks.
Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net a ?crit:
Hello,
I've had this patch some time
Hello,
I've had this patch some time now, it's simple and cosmetic only, I
had done it while trying to understand expression costs in CSE. I
think it's more readable than the previous one. FWIW it passed all tests
on x86.
Thanks,
Dimitris=== modified file 'gcc/cse.c'
--- gcc/cse.c