On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:29:44PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> On 07/06/13 04:00, Alan Modra wrote:
> > force_const_mem() isn't supposed to handle VOIDmode or BLKmode, so the
> > check for VOIDmode when aligning is needless. If we ever did get one
> > of these modes in a constant pool, this
>
On 07/06/13 04:00, Alan Modra wrote:
> force_const_mem() isn't supposed to handle VOIDmode or BLKmode, so the
> check for VOIDmode when aligning is needless. If we ever did get one
> of these modes in a constant pool, this
>
> pool->offset += GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
Hi Alan,
the assertion is tr
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> force_const_mem() isn't supposed to handle VOIDmode or BLKmode, so the
> check for VOIDmode when aligning is needless. If we ever did get one
> of these modes in a constant pool, this
>
> pool->offset += GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
>
> won't add to
force_const_mem() isn't supposed to handle VOIDmode or BLKmode, so the
check for VOIDmode when aligning is needless. If we ever did get one
of these modes in a constant pool, this
pool->offset += GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
won't add to the pool size, and output_constant_pool_2() will hit a
gcc_unre