On Mär 21 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> @anchor{sparc-x-linux}
>>> @heading sparc-*-linux*
>> The section is now empty. Should it be removed at all?
>
> I considered that, but then figured we do want to keep this as
> an indicator this is a suppor
On Sun, 19 Mar 2017, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> @anchor{sparc-x-linux}
>> @heading sparc-*-linux*
> The section is now empty. Should it be removed at all?
I considered that, but then figured we do want to keep this as
an indicator this is a supported platform (and also placeholder
if/when any new
On Mär 19 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Index: doc/install.texi
> ===
> --- doc/install.texi (revision 246259)
> +++ doc/install.texi (working copy)
> @@ -4510,11 +4510,6 @@
> @anchor{sparc-x-linux}
> @heading sparc-*-linux*
>
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, David Miller wrote:
>> Okay to yank it?
> No objections from me.
Thanks. Here is what I just committed.
Gerald
2017-03-19 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/install.texi (Specific) : No longer refer
to age-old versions of binutils and glibc.
Index: doc/install.texi
From: Gerald Pfeifer
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 12:39:56 +0100 (CET)
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
>> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
>> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete sugges
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
> binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
> Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions
> around that.
The section on sparc-*-linux* currently has this:
