Re: isl scheduler and spatial locality (Re: [PATCH][GRAPHITE] More TLC)

2017-11-11 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:58:30AM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote: > For the approach pluto is taking, you'll have to look at the source > code, see pluto_intra_tile_optimize_band. > For the other two approaches I mentioned above, reports will > be made available within the next couple of weeks. ht

Re: isl scheduler and spatial locality (Re: [PATCH][GRAPHITE] More TLC)

2017-10-01 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 07:47:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On September 29, 2017 9:58:41 PM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Pop > wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Sven Verdoolaege > > wrote: > >> [Sorry for the resend; I used the wrong email address to CC Alex] > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 27, 201

Re: isl scheduler and spatial locality (Re: [PATCH][GRAPHITE] More TLC)

2017-09-30 Thread Richard Biener
On September 29, 2017 9:58:41 PM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Pop wrote: >On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Sven Verdoolaege > wrote: >> [Sorry for the resend; I used the wrong email address to CC Alex] >> >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >>> Ah, so I now see why we do no

Re: isl scheduler and spatial locality (Re: [PATCH][GRAPHITE] More TLC)

2017-09-29 Thread Oleksandr Zinenko
On 29/09/17 21:58, Sebastian Pop wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Sven Verdoolaege wrote: [Sorry for the resend; I used the wrong email address to CC Alex] On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: Ah, so I now see why we do not perform interchange on trivial ca

Re: isl scheduler and spatial locality (Re: [PATCH][GRAPHITE] More TLC)

2017-09-29 Thread Sebastian Pop
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Sven Verdoolaege wrote: > [Sorry for the resend; I used the wrong email address to CC Alex] > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: >> Ah, so I now see why we do not perform interchange on trivial cases like >> >> double A[1024][1024], B

isl scheduler and spatial locality (Re: [PATCH][GRAPHITE] More TLC)

2017-09-29 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
[Sorry for the resend; I used the wrong email address to CC Alex] On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > Ah, so I now see why we do not perform interchange on trivial cases like > > double A[1024][1024], B[1024][1024]; > > void foo(void) > { > for (int i = 0; i < 102

isl scheduler and spatial locality (Re: [PATCH][GRAPHITE] More TLC)

2017-09-29 Thread Sven Verdoolaege
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > Ah, so I now see why we do not perform interchange on trivial cases like > > double A[1024][1024], B[1024][1024]; > > void foo(void) > { > for (int i = 0; i < 1024; ++i) > for (int j = 0; j < 1024; ++j) > A[j][i] = B[j]