: libcpp: registering both a pragma and a pragma namespace with the
> same name
>
> On 04/11/13 07:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:10:46AM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >>> Yeah, the above is definitely wrong. Just
> >>>if (flag
On 04/11/13 07:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:10:46AM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Yeah, the above is definitely wrong. Just
if (flag_cilkplus)
cpp_register_deferred_pragma (parse_in, NULL, "simd", PRAGMA_SIMD, true,
false);
Well, the thing is that you can't just
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:10:46AM -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >Yeah, the above is definitely wrong. Just
> > if (flag_cilkplus)
> > cpp_register_deferred_pragma (parse_in, NULL, "simd", PRAGMA_SIMD,
> > true, false);
>
> Well, the thing is that you can't just use NULL for "#pragma simd
On 04/11/13 00:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 05:16:17PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi Tom. Hi folks.
We've asked Balaji to rewrite the <#pragma simd> handling for cilkplus as we
currently do for OMP, etc, in init_prag
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 05:16:17PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Hi Tom. Hi folks.
> >
> > We've asked Balaji to rewrite the <#pragma simd> handling for cilkplus as we
> > currently do for OMP, etc, in init_pragma().
> >
> > The cilkplus
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Hi Tom. Hi folks.
>
> We've asked Balaji to rewrite the <#pragma simd> handling for cilkplus as we
> currently do for OMP, etc, in init_pragma().
>
> The cilkplus branch currently has something like:
>
> cpp_register_deferred_pragma (
Hi Tom. Hi folks.
We've asked Balaji to rewrite the <#pragma simd> handling for cilkplus
as we currently do for OMP, etc, in init_pragma().
The cilkplus branch currently has something like:
cpp_register_deferred_pragma (parse_in, "simd", "",
PRAGMA_SIM
