Re: miter_base simplification

2015-05-20 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 03/05/15 22:19 +0200, François Dumont wrote: On 30/04/2015 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote: On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote: (Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for __miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base or just two

Re: miter_base simplification

2015-05-19 Thread François Dumont
On 03/05/2015 22:19, François Dumont wrote: On 30/04/2015 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote: On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote: (Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for __miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base or just two

miter_base simplification

2015-05-03 Thread François Dumont
On 30/04/2015 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 30/04/15 10:40 +0200, François Dumont wrote: On 27/04/2015 13:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote: (Alternatively, could the same simplification be made for __miter_base? Do we need _Miter_base or just two overloads of __miter_base()?) Definitely, I