On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Eric Botcazou
>> wrote:
>> >> We do not depend on the block structure any more when dealing with
>> >> stack layout for variables in GCC 4.7.0 and above. I am not saying
>> >> your patch is incorrect or not
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> >> We do not depend on the block structure any more when dealing with
> >> stack layout for variables in GCC 4.7.0 and above. I am not saying
> >> your patch is incorrect or not needed. Just it will not have an
> >> effect on variable st
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> We do not depend on the block structure any more when dealing with
>> stack layout for variables in GCC 4.7.0 and above. I am not saying
>> your patch is incorrect or not needed. Just it will not have an
>> effect on variable stack layout
> We do not depend on the block structure any more when dealing with
> stack layout for variables in GCC 4.7.0 and above. I am not saying
> your patch is incorrect or not needed. Just it will not have an
> effect on variable stack layout.
It might be worth backporting to the 4.6 branch though, t
please the find test case in the attachment. It shows the issue in
google-4_6 branch
-c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing ss.C -fdump-rtl-expand-all
in the rtl-expand dump, trianglevertices and one the gtest_ar are in
the same partition.
the problem is found in arm compiler, but we manager to reproduce
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In split_function() (ipa-split.c), for the newly created call stmt,
> its block is set to the outermost scope, i.e.
> DECL_INITIAL(current_function_decl). When we inline this
> partially outlined function, we create the new block based on t
Hi,
In split_function() (ipa-split.c), for the newly created call stmt,
its block is set to the outermost scope, i.e.
DECL_INITIAL(current_function_decl). When we inline this
partially outlined function, we create the new block based on the
block for the call stmt (in expand_call_inline()).
So th
