Hi
Is it time now to consider this patch ?
* include/bits/stl_vector.h
(_Vector_impl_data): New.
(_Vector_impl): Inherit from latter.
(_Vertor_impl(_Vector_impl&&, _Tp_alloc_type&&)): New.
(_Vector_base(_Vector_base&&, const allocator_type&)): Use latter.
(_Vector_bas
Hi
There was a little issue in this patch, here is the correct version.
François
On 23/07/2017 19:41, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Is it time now to consider this patch ?
* include/bits/stl_vector.h
(_Vector_impl_data): New.
(_Vector_impl): Inherit from latter.
(_Vertor
Following feedback on std::list patch this one had the same problem of
unused code being deleted. So here is a new version.
Ok to commit ?
François
On 28/07/2017 18:45, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
There was a little issue in this patch, here is the correct version.
François
On 23/07/201
Hi
Gentle reminder.
Thanks
On 21/08/2017 21:15, François Dumont wrote:
Following feedback on std::list patch this one had the same problem of
unused code being deleted. So here is a new version.
Ok to commit ?
François
On 28/07/2017 18:45, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
There was a l
On 02/06/18 14:00 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is this patch again, I consider all your remarks and also
made some changes considering feedback on rbtree patch.
+ _Vector_impl(_Tp_alloc_type const& __a) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
+ : _Tp_alloc_type(__a)
+ { }
+
+#if _
Commited attached patch.
It fixes the missing noexcept qualification on a __gnu_debug::vector<>
constructor.
2018-06-27 François Dumont
* include/bits/stl_vector.h
(struct _Vector_base<>::_Vector_impl_data): New.
(struct _Vector_base<>::_Vector_impl): Inherit from latter.
(
Hi
Here is an updated patch.
Tested under Linux x86_64.
Ok to commit ?
François
On 21/08/2017 21:15, François Dumont wrote:
Following feedback on std::list patch this one had the same problem of
unused code being deleted. So here is a new version.
Ok to commit ?
François
On
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, François Dumont wrote:
- void _M_swap_data(_Vector_impl& __x) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
+ void
+ _M_swap_data(_Vector_impl_data& __x) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
{
std::swap(_M_start, __x._M_start);
std::swap(_M_finish, __x._M_finish);
st
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, François Dumont wrote:
- void _M_swap_data(_Vector_impl& __x) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
+ void
+ _M_swap_data(_Vector_impl_data& __x) _GLIBCXX_NOEXCEPT
{
std::swap(_M_start, __x._M_start);
std::swap(
On 16/01/2018 01:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/01/18 22:32 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 15/01/2018 13:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
In fact it introduces a serious regression because of this line:
- vector(vector&& __x) noexcept
- : _Base(std::move(__x)) { }
+ vector(vector
On 18/01/18 22:01 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 16/01/2018 01:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/01/18 22:32 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 15/01/2018 13:29, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
In fact it introduces a serious regression because of this line:
- vector(vector&& __x) noexcept
-
Hi
Here is this patch again, I consider all your remarks and also made
some changes considering feedback on rbtree patch.
* include/bits/stl_vector.h
(struct _Vector_base<>::_Vector_impl_data): New.
(struct _Vector_base<>::_Vector_impl): Inherit from latter.
(_Vector_base<>
12 matches
Mail list logo
