On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:47 PM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> I've observed an LTO wrong-code bug with a large testcase in GCC 12,
> that results from TYPE_TYPELESS_STORAGE not being set consistently on
> type variants.
>
> Specifically, in the LTO stage of compilation, there is an aggregate
> type
I've observed an LTO wrong-code bug with a large testcase in GCC 12,
that results from TYPE_TYPELESS_STORAGE not being set consistently on
type variants.
Specifically, in the LTO stage of compilation, there is an aggregate
type passed to get_alias_set, whose TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT does not have
