On Nov 8, 2023, at 8:29 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 2023, Mike Stump wrote:
>
>> that, otherwise, I'll approve this version.
>
> FWIW, this version is not usable as is. Something went wrong in my
> testing, and several regressions only visible in hosted mode made to the
>
On Nov 5, 2023, Mike Stump wrote:
> that, otherwise, I'll approve this version.
FWIW, this version is not usable as is. Something went wrong in my
testing, and several regressions only visible in hosted mode made to the
version I posted, that adds some missing end-of-comment markers for the
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 15:48, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 15:30, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > > An alternative approach for the g++ testsuite would be to provide a
> > > set of dummy headers for the non-freestanding ones, so
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 15:30, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > An alternative approach for the g++ testsuite would be to provide a
> > set of dummy headers for the non-freestanding ones, so that all the
> > hosted-only headers are provided by the testsuite
On Nov 7, 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> An alternative approach for the g++ testsuite would be to provide a
> set of dummy headers for the non-freestanding ones, so that all the
> hosted-only headers are provided by the testsuite itself, but consist
> of a single line:
> #error not available
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 10:24, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 10:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 10:04, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > >
> > > [adding libstdc++@]
> > >
> > > On Nov 5, 2023, Mike Stump wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ick.
> > >
> > > Indeed ;-)
> > >
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 10:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 10:04, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> > [adding libstdc++@]
> >
> > On Nov 5, 2023, Mike Stump wrote:
> >
> > > Ick.
> >
> > Indeed ;-)
> >
> > > I wish there were fewer changed lines and not 1 per test
> > > case. It
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 10:04, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> [adding libstdc++@]
>
> On Nov 5, 2023, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> > Ick.
>
> Indeed ;-)
>
> > I wish there were fewer changed lines and not 1 per test
> > case. It feels like we've painted ourselves into a corner.
>
> The libstdc++ testsuite
[adding libstdc++@]
On Nov 5, 2023, Mike Stump wrote:
> Ick.
Indeed ;-)
> I wish there were fewer changed lines and not 1 per test
> case. It feels like we've painted ourselves into a corner.
The libstdc++ testsuite took a different approach, detecting missing
headers (and libraries?) at
On Nov 1, 2023, at 6:11 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Several C++ tests fail with --disable-hosted-libstdcxx, whether
> because stdc++ext gets linked in despite not being built, because
> standard headers are included but that are unavailable in this mode,
> or because headers are (mistakenly?)
10 matches
Mail list logo
