I added it to bugzilla here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111396
Since this only reproduces part of the issue, please let me test again
with rustc_codegen_gcc after adding the missing fix.
I confirmed that the fix is in
In the mean time, here's a (Rust) reproducer for the issue:
fn main() {
for _ in 0..5 {
let context = Context::default();
context.add_command_line_option("-flto");
context.set_optimization_level(OptimizationLevel::Aggressive);
It seems to not be enough to fix the issue.
Let me find out what's missing from my patch.
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:35 +0200, Richard Biener via Jit wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 3:41 PM David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > As part of Antoyo's work on supporting LTO in
Hi.
I'll do another test to make sure this is enough since I tested with a
few more finalize functions.
Thanks a lot for finding this!
On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 09:40 -0400, David Malcolm via Jit wrote:
> As part of Antoyo's work on supporting LTO in rustc_codegen_gcc, he
> noticed an ICE inside
Since the tests in the PR for rustc_codegen_gcc
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc/pull/312) currently
fails, let's wait a bit before merging the patch, in case it would need
some fixes.
On Thu, 2023-08-17 at 20:09 +0200, Guillaume Gomez via Jit wrote:
> Quick question: do you plan
I forgot to attach the patch.
Here it is.
On Sat, 2023-02-11 at 19:30 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Jit wrote:
> Hi.
> This patch adds support for machine-dependent builtins in libgccjit
> (bug 108762).
>
> There are two things I don't like in this patch:
>
> 1. There are a few functions copied
Hi.
This patch adds support for machine-dependent builtins in libgccjit
(bug 108762).
There are two things I don't like in this patch:
1. There are a few functions copied from the C frontend
(common_mark_addressable_vec and a few others).
2. Getting a target builtin only works from the second
Ping David:
Some more notes about the try/catch API:
I finally got unwinding implemented in rustc_codegen_gcc with the
following GCC patch:
https://github.com/antoyo/gcc/commit/fd603a3c715d3708f831cb637fbcc48bf4641859
It still requires clean-up, but you can have a look at it.
I'm still unsure
Thanks!
In your patch, you're missing this line at the end of the commit
message:
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Gomez
On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 14:39 +0100, Guillaume Gomez via Jit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This fixes bug 107999.
>
> Thanks in advance for the review.
Thanks!
David: you mentioned gcc 10. For now, I only intend to make changes to
the next release (13). Is this OK or should I backport all my fixes to
all active releases? (I'm not sure what are GCC policies here.)
On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 16:24 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-12-12 at
Hi.
This fixes bug 108078.
Thanks for the review.
From 016d23eeab1536e2ce0607d422fe4bb42b55c2dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 21:05:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] libgccjit: Allow comparing vector types
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:
PR jit/108078
* jit-recording.h: Add
I'm posting the patch again so that you can double-check that I wrote
the DCO for the co-author correctly.
Does that look good?
Thanks.
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:57 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:33 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:25 -0500, David
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:57 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:33 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:25 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:01 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > > Thanks, David.
> > > > Since we're not in phase 1
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:25 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 10:01 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Thanks, David.
> > Since we're not in phase 1 anymore, do we need an approval before I
> > merge like last year or can I merge immediately?
>
> I think it counts as a bug fix and
Thanks, David.
Since we're not in phase 1 anymore, do we need an approval before I
merge like last year or can I merge immediately?
I also have many other patches (all in jit) that I need to prepare and
post to this mailing list.
What do you think?
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 09:28 -0500, David Malcolm
David: PING
On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 14:03 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> This fixes bug 107770.
> Thanks for the review.
Hi.
This fixes bug 107770.
Thanks for the review.
From 1112e92624d41ec96c366fdb60101e1040462522 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:22:53 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] libgccjit: Fix float vector comparison
Fix float vector comparison and add comparison tests didn't
-asm.cc:160:11: error: typedef 'uint32_t'
is initialized (use 'decltype' instead)
Are you OK with me adding the stdint.h header?
On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 18:40 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 22:45 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Also, the test gcc/test
Thanks for the review.
Does this mean I can commit it, assuming the output of compare_tests is
good?
By the way, I wanted to mention that it was my first time playing with
the assembly generation, so I was not sure about my changes (even
though it makes the test case compile, I'm not sure it
David: PING
On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 22:45 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Also, the test gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-asm.cc fails and would need
> this line:
>
> #include
>
> Is this okay if I add it in this patch?
>
> On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 22:13 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > The
Hi.
The attached patch fix bug 105829:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105829
Thanks for the review.
From 5d75fd342cdcea94a785312252be0c0046afdf43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 21:42:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] libgccjit: Support getting the size
Sorry, forgot to attach the patch.
Here it is.
On Thu, 2022-06-02 at 21:20 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Jit wrote:
> Hi.
> The attached patch fix bug 105827:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105827
>
> I'm not sure how to test this, so please share ideas.
>
> Thanks for the review.
Hi.
The attached patch fix bug 105827:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105827
I'm not sure how to test this, so please share ideas.
Thanks for the review.
Also, the test gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-asm.cc fails and would need
this line:
#include
Is this okay if I add it in this patch?
On Wed, 2022-06-01 at 22:13 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> Hi.
> The attached patch fix bug 105812:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105812
>
> I'm
Hi.
The attached patch fix bug 105812:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105812
I'm having an issue where contrib/check_GNU_style.sh doesn't seem to
work, i.e. it doesn't seem to do any checking.
Is there a new way to do that or am I missing something?
Thanks for the review.
From
Here's the updated patch.
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:22 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 18:41 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Here's the updated patch.
> >
>
> Thanks. Review below:
>
> [...snip...]
>
> > diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.cc
> >
Here's the updated patch.
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:01 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-01-30 at 20:38 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > This patch adds support for setting the alignment of variables in
> > libgccjit.
>
>
On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 15:36 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> I'm excited to read that rustc_codegen_gcc, the libgccjit-based
> backend
> for rustc can now bootstrap rustc:
> https://blog.antoyo.xyz/rustc_codegen_gcc-progress-report-10
>
> I've been focusing on the analyzer, and so haven't been as
3 +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Jit wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:23:56AM -0400, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-
> > > patches wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > > This patch add support for sized integer types.
> > > > Maybe it should check whether th
;
> > > Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 18:49 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > > > On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 19:46 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-
> > > > patches
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I missed the comment about the new d
Hi.
This patch adds support for setting the alignment of variables in
libgccjit.
I was wondering if I should change it so that it takes/returns bytes
instead of bits.
What do you think?
Thanks for the review.
From ebdb6905f23ddef28292a1d71081eebb7a2a9bb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni
See answers below.
Le lundi 24 janvier 2022 à 18:20 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Sat, 2022-01-22 at 19:29 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 18:49 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > > On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 19:46 -0500,
at 19:46 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > > I missed the comment about the new define, so here's the
> > > > updated
> > > > patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch.
> > > >
>
Thanks for the review.
Here's the updated patch.
Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 18:22 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 21:02 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > This option will be useful for rustc_codegen_gcc to hide the error
> &g
Hi.
Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 18:49 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 19:46 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > I missed the comment about the new define, so here's the updated
> > patch.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
> >
> &
Hi.
Here's the updated patch.
See comments below.
Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 18:06 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 19:30 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > I was missing the define, so I added it.
> > Here's the new patch with it.
>
&
:
> On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 14:53 +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Jit wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:23:56AM -0400, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-
> > patches wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > > This patch add support for sized integer types.
> > > Maybe it should check
Also, I put the extern in gcc/system.h, but I'm not sure it's the right
place.
Where should I put it?
Le lundi 17 janvier 2022 à 19:46 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Jit a
écrit :
> I missed the comment about the new define, so here's the updated
> patch.
>
> Le lundi 17 janvier 2022 à 19:24 -0500,
Hi.
This option will be useful for rustc_codegen_gcc to hide the error
about unsupported 128-bit integer types.
David, if you know of a better way to check if these types are
supported than creating such a type and checking if it causes an error,
I will not need this patch.
Thanks for the
I missed the comment about the new define, so here's the updated patch.
Le lundi 17 janvier 2022 à 19:24 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Jit a
écrit :
> Hi.
> This patch add supports for register variables in libgccjit.
>
> It passes the JIT tests, but since I added a function in reginfo.c, I
> wonder
I was missing the define, so I added it.
Here's the new patch with it.
Le lundi 17 janvier 2022 à 17:18 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Jit a
écrit :
> Hi.
> This patch add support for bitcasts in libgccjit.
>
> It passes the JIT tests, but since I added a function in tree.c, I
> wonder if I should
Hi.
This patch add supports for register variables in libgccjit.
It passes the JIT tests, but since I added a function in reginfo.c, I
wonder if I should run the whole testsuite.
Thanks for the review.
From 328eca2be438c4a05c21942b4b2c3650ff7de0eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Hi.
This patch add support for bitcasts in libgccjit.
It passes the JIT tests, but since I added a function in tree.c, I
wonder if I should run the whole testsuite.
David, you can now disregard my question in my email about 128-bit
integers regarding my issue with initialize_sizetypes being
Hi, David!
One question below as I'm still not done with using this patch in
rustc_codegen_gcc.
Le jeudi 20 mai 2021 à 15:25 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 14:53 +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Jit wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:23:56AM -0400, Antoni Bouche
Oh, sorry, I meant when you have an array not in a local variable, and
you try to assign to an index of this array.
Something like:
gcc_jit_rvalue *ctor = gcc_jit_context_new_array_constructor
(ctxt,0,int50arr_type,6,values);
gcc_jit_block_add_assignment (block, 0,
I realized that trying to do an assignment to an array created by the
new array constructor API will result in a "gimplification failed"
error:
libgccjit.so: error: gimplification failed
0x7fa3a441e5d3 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool
(*)(tree_node*), int)
Hi Petter.
I believe you have forgotten the line `global:` in the file
`gcc/jit/libgccjit.map`.
I'm not sure what this line does, but it is there for all other ABI.
David: What do you think?
Regards.
Le mardi 14 décembre 2021 à 17:22 +, Petter Tomner via Jit a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
> I have pushed
Also, the LIBGCCJIT_ABI_17 will need to be updated as I merged some of
my patches.
Le samedi 11 décembre 2021 à 15:35 +, Petter Tomner a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> > s/an union/a union/
> > s/a rvalue/an rvalue/
>
> Heh no way ... and I though I knew English grammar :)
>
> Had to look that up to
One thing I'm not sure if it is a code style issue, but worth
mentionning:
> @@ -1405,8 +1436,10 @@ private:
>
> private:
>enum gcc_jit_global_kind m_kind;
> + enum global_var_flags flags = GLOBAL_VAR_FLAGS_NONE;
^
Should it be named m_flags instead of
Yes, this patch works for rustc_codegen_gcc perfectly.
It even fixes one issue that was in my patch, so that's nice!
Le samedi 11 décembre 2021 à 15:35 +, Petter Tomner a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> > s/an union/a union/
> > s/a rvalue/an rvalue/
>
> Heh no way ... and I though I knew English grammar
David: PING
In case you missed it, that's the last patch left to review for now.
Le dimanche 21 novembre 2021 à 16:44 -0500, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> Thanks for the review!
> I updated the patch.
>
> See notes below.
>
> Le samedi 20 novembre 2021 à 13:50 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> >
Hi David!
I updated the patch to allow initializing global variables with values
of type array or struct.
I also fixed the bug I was talking in my previous message by using the
following workaround: I create a new memento for the action of setting
the global variable initial value and as such,
Thanks for the review!
I updated the patch.
See notes below.
Le samedi 20 novembre 2021 à 13:50 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 11:27 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Here's the updated patch.
> > Thanks for the review!
>
> Thanks for the updated patch...
>
> >
Hi.
Here's the updated patch.
See comments below.
Thanks for your reviews!
Le jeudi 20 mai 2021 à 16:11 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 20:43 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > This patch adds support for TLS variables.
> >
Hi.
Here's the updated patch.
See comments below.
Thanks for the review!
Le samedi 20 novembre 2021 à 11:20 -0500, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 00:58 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Thanks for your reviews!
> >
> > Here's the updated patch, ready for another review.
> > See
Hi.
Here's the updated patch.
Thanks for the review!
Le jeudi 20 mai 2021 à 16:24 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 21:02 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Jit wrote:
> > Hello.
> > This patch fixes the issue with using atomic builtins in libgccjit.
> > Thanks to review it.
>
>
Thanks for your reviews!
Here's the updated patch, ready for another review.
See comments/questions below.
I'll update the other patches over the weekend.
Le jeudi 20 mai 2021 à 15:29 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 20:32 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Jit wrote:
> > Hello.
>
David: PING
Le mardi 12 octobre 2021 à 22:09 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> David: PING
>
> Le lundi 27 septembre 2021 à 20:53 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> > I fixed an issue (it would show an error message when
> > gcc_jit_type_dyncast_function_ptr_type was called on a type
> >
David: PING
Le lundi 27 septembre 2021 à 20:53 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> I fixed an issue (it would show an error message when
> gcc_jit_type_dyncast_function_ptr_type was called on a type different
> than a function pointer type).
>
> Here's the updated patch.
>
> Le vendredi 18 juin
I fixed an issue (it would show an error message when
gcc_jit_type_dyncast_function_ptr_type was called on a type different
than a function pointer type).
Here's the updated patch.
Le vendredi 18 juin 2021 à 16:37 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 15:41 -0400, Antoni Boucher
David: PING
Le jeudi 29 juillet 2021 à 08:59 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> David: PING
>
> Le lundi 19 juillet 2021 à 12:10 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> > I'm sending the patch once again for review/approval.
> >
> > I fixed the doc to use the new function names.
> >
> > Le vendredi
David: PING
Le lundi 19 juillet 2021 à 12:10 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> I'm sending the patch once again for review/approval.
>
> I fixed the doc to use the new function names.
>
> Le vendredi 18 juin 2021 à 16:37 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 15:41 -0400,
I'm sending the patch once again for review/approval.
I fixed the doc to use the new function names.
Le vendredi 18 juin 2021 à 16:37 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 15:41 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > I have write access now.
>
> Great.
>
> > I'm not sure how I'm
i 2021 à 18:13 -0400, David Malcolm a
> > > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 17:17 -0500, Antoni Boucher via
> > > > > > > > > Gcc-
> > > > > > > > > patche
Hi.
I pushed a patch adding myself to the maintainers file.
From 93022946df2463ad49e3eaa2f6d43c47c16f31c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:49:20 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself for write after approval
ChangeLog:
2021-06-18 Antoni Boucher
t; >
> > > > Should I just remove the condition, then?
> > >
> > > I think so.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 19:58 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > > > > O
I have write access now.
I'm not sure how I'm supposed to send my patches:
should I put it in personal branches and you'll merge them?
And for the MAINTAINERS file, should I just push to master right away,
after sending it to the mailing list?
Thanks for your help!
Le vendredi 18 juin 2021 à
Le vendredi 11 juin 2021 à 14:00 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Fri, 2021-06-11 at 08:15 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > Thank you for your answer.
> > I attached the updated patch.
>
> BTW you (or possibly me) dropped the mailing lists; was that
> deliberate?
Oh, my bad.
> >
> > See my
David: this one wasn't reviewed yet by you, so you can review it.
Le jeudi 20 mai 2021 à 21:27 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> I made this patch to set an arbitrary value to a global variable.
>
> This patch suffers from the same issue as inline assembly
>
I chose option A, so everything is a size_t, now.
I also renamed the dyncast functions.
Here's the new patch.
Le jeudi 27 mai 2021 à 18:19 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 20:19 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > @David: PING
> >
> > As far as I know, the only remaining
Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 19:58 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > > On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 19:31 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > > > Thanks for your answer.
> > > >
> > > > See my answers below:
> > > >
> > > > Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 18:13 -0400, David
Hi.
Here's the new patch with the fixes requested.
Le jeudi 20 mai 2021 à 16:24 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 21:02 -0400, Antoni Boucher via Jit wrote:
> > Hello.
> > This patch fixes the issue with using atomic builtins in libgccjit.
> > Thanks to review it.
>
>
@David: PING
As far as I know, the only remaining question is about using `ssize_t`
for the return type of some functions.
Here's why I use this type:
That seemed off to return NULL for the functions returning a
size_t to indicate an error. So I changed it to return -1 (and return
type to
> > Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 18:13 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> > > On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 17:17 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > > Thanks for your feedback!
> > > >
> > >
> > > So
Hi.
I made this patch to set an arbitrary value to a global variable.
This patch suffers from the same issue as inline assembly
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380), i.e. it
segfaults if the `rvalue` is created after the global variable.
It seems to be a design issue so I'm not
Hello.
This patch adds support to set the link section of global variables.
I used the ABI 18 because I submitted other patches up to 17.
Thanks for the review.
From c867732ee36003759d479497c85135ecfc4a0cf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 07:57:54 -0400
Hello.
This patch adds support for TLS variables.
One thing to fix before we merge it is the libgccjit.map file which
contains LIBGCCJIT_ABI_16 instead of LIBGCCJIT_ABI_17.
LIBGCCJIT_ABI_16 was added in one of my other patches.
Thanks for the review.
From 6092e3d347972d331ed9ac6cae153168e98ecd0d
I had forgotten to update the documentation.
This new patch contains it.
Le mardi 18 mai 2021 à 08:23 -0400, Antoni Boucher a écrit :
> Hello.
> This patch add support for sized integer types.
> Maybe it should check whether the size of a byte for the current
> platform is 8 bits and do other
Hello.
This patch add support for sized integer types.
Maybe it should check whether the size of a byte for the current
platform is 8 bits and do other checks so that they're only available
when it makes sense.
What do you think?
Thanks.
From d194a03fe3f2e8164c39413b79da9c43e236cf37 Mon Sep 17
Hello.
This patch fixes the issue with using atomic builtins in libgccjit.
Thanks to review it.
From 0ce53d373ffba9f3f80a2d2b4e1a7d724ba31b7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antoni Boucher
Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 20:14:37 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for types used by atomic builtins [PR96066]
Thanks for your reviews.
I attached the new patch to this email.
See answers below:
Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 17:30 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 17:13 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> > I was missing a check in gcc_jit_struct_get_field, I added it in
> > this
> > new patch.
Thanks for your answer.
See my answers below:
Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 18:13 -0400, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 17:17 -0500, Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Thanks for your feedback!
> >
>
> Sorry about the delay in
Hi.
Thanks for your feedback!
See answers below:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:20:35AM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Antoni" == Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches writes:
Antoni> gcc/jit/
Antoni> PR target/95498
Antoni> * jit-playback.c: Add support to handle truncation a
Hi.
I'd like to know what's the status of the review for this patch.
(Same for my other patch 96889: add some reflection functions in the jit
C api)
Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:29:57PM +0200, Andrea Corallo wrote:
Hi Antoni,
a couple of nits and some thoughts.
Antoni Boucher via Gcc
I was missing a check in gcc_jit_struct_get_field, I added it in this
new patch.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:52:33PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 13:39 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
Thanks. I updated the patch with these changes.
Thanks for patch; review below. Sorry if
Hi.
Thanks for the review. See the comments below.
I attached the updated patch.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:52:33PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 13:39 -0400, Antoni Boucher wrote:
Thanks. I updated the patch with these changes.
Thanks for patch; review below. Sorry if
that work.
David, any more insight about whether this is the good solution for the
problem?
Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:29:57PM +0200, Andrea Corallo wrote:
Hi Antoni,
a couple of nits and some thoughts.
Antoni Boucher via Gcc-patches writes:
2020-07-12 Antoni Boucher
gcc/jit
Thanks. I updated the patch with these changes.
Is there any tool to automatically check the style?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 06:23:18PM +0200, Andrea Corallo wrote:
Antoni Boucher via Jit writes:
Hi Antoni,
Just had a quick look, please find some quite minor comments in line.
From
Hi.
I added all the functions I need in this new patch.
Please tell me if that looks good and I'll add documentation for those
functions.
Thanks.
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:24:26PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 16:17 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 21:01
By the way, that seemed off to return NULL for the function returning a
size_t to indicate an error. So I changed it to return -1 (and return
type to ssize_t). Is that the proper way to indicate an error?
I also wanted to mention that this patch is still a work-in-progress as
I'm adding a
Hi.
Thanks for the review.
I attached the updated patch file.
I don't have a copyright assignment, but I'll look at that.
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 04:24:26PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 16:17 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 21:01 -0400, Antoni Boucher via
Hello.
This WIP patch implements new reflection functions in the C API as
mentioned in bug 96889.
I'm looking forward for feedbacks on this patch.
It's WIP because I'll probably add a few more reflection functions.
Thanks.
>From 23ab738c0d9202f6798a38fb4aa15edfcc67d11c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Hello.
As mentioned in bug 95498, some conversions do not work. After
investigation, it turns out that it's caused by multiple casts on an
expression where it should do a truncation/extension.
I added a testcase, but for some reasons, the tests only pass when ran
via
93 matches
Mail list logo
