> (I'm assuming the difference is due to some architectural
> constraints as opposed to arbitrary limitations in the code
There're 2 difference:
1. target support unaligned store or not.
2. target support move by piece or not(which will enable block move in gimple
level).
Updated patch.
Adjust
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:34 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 10/28/21 7:47 PM, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:20 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/28/21 1:23 AM, liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>> Adjust code in check_vect_slp_aligned_store_usage to
On 10/28/21 7:47 PM, Hongtao Liu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:20 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 10/28/21 1:23 AM, liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
Adjust code in check_vect_slp_aligned_store_usage to make it an exact
pattern match of the corresponding testcases.
These new
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 12:20 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 10/28/21 1:23 AM, liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Adjust code in check_vect_slp_aligned_store_usage to make it an exact
> > pattern match of the corresponding testcases.
> > These new target/xfail selectors are added
On 10/28/21 1:23 AM, liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
Adjust code in check_vect_slp_aligned_store_usage to make it an exact
pattern match of the corresponding testcases.
These new target/xfail selectors are added as a temporary solution,
and should be removed after real issue is fixed for
Adjust code in check_vect_slp_aligned_store_usage to make it an exact
pattern match of the corresponding testcases.
These new target/xfail selectors are added as a temporary solution,
and should be removed after real issue is fixed for Wstringop-overflow.
gcc/ChangeLog:
*
