Regressions on master at commit r15-3057 vs commit r15-3052 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 execution test
Regressions on master at commit r15-3057 vs commit r15-3052 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 execution test
The three avx10.2 related test regression are all related to the usage of
-mavx10.2 -march=cascadelake, which is unavoidable warning.
I am considering to change -march=cascadelake to a arch with AVX10 in
the future to avoid these false alarms.
Thx,
Haochen
> -Original Message-
> From: ha
Regressions on master at commit r15-3052 vs commit r15-3046 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 execution test
New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-3052 vs commit r15-3051 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/sizeof_6.f90 -O1 execution test
New passes:
Regressions on master at commit r15-3041 vs commit r15-3037 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
N
On Linux/x86_64,
6e231f8504874828b23bbe89f3ef4086dcc15a44 is the first bad commit
commit 6e231f8504874828b23bbe89f3ef4086dcc15a44
Author: Hu, Lin1
Date: Mon Aug 19 10:08:59 2024 +0800
AVX10.2 ymm rounding: Support vcvtqq2p{s,d,h} and vcvttpd2{,u}{dq,qq}
intrins
caused
FAIL: gcc.target/i
On Linux/x86_64,
3d1b5530ea1d23e26dc5ab70aa4a2e7b9dc19b50 is the first bad commit
commit 3d1b5530ea1d23e26dc5ab70aa4a2e7b9dc19b50
Author: Hu, Lin1
Date: Mon Aug 19 10:09:03 2024 +0800
AVX10.2 ymm rounding: Support vcvt{,u}w2ph and vdivp{s,d,h} intrins
caused
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_2
On Linux/x86_64,
e22e3af1954469c40b139b7cfa8e7708592f4bfd is the first bad commit
commit e22e3af1954469c40b139b7cfa8e7708592f4bfd
Author: Hu, Lin1
Date: Mon Aug 19 10:08:51 2024 +0800
AVX10.2 ymm rounding: Support vadd{s,d,h} and vcmp{s,d,h} intrins
caused
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-r
This is already recorded as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116409
. I am about to submit a v2 of the patch to fix this too.
> -Original Message-
> From: ci_not...@linaro.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:34 AM
> To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC)
> Cc: gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.or
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on
Regressions on master at commit r15-3038 vs commit r15-3037 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
New
Regressions on master at commit r15-3038 vs commit r15-3037 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++26 (test for excess errors)
N
13 matches
Mail list logo