Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, please 
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the 
usual project channel.

We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within 
minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.

We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1194 , 
please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix.

In gcc_check master-arm after:

  | commit gcc-14-9912-gc7e8a8d8142
  | Author: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
  | Date:   Thu Apr 11 11:08:07 2024 +0200
  | 
  |     tree-optimization/109596 - wrong debug stmt move by copyheader
  |     
  |     The following fixes an omission in r14-162-gcda246f8b421ba causing
  |     wrong-debug and a bunch of guality regressions.
  |     
  |             PR tree-optimization/109596
  |             * tree-ssa-loop-ch.cc (ch_base::copy_headers): Propagate
  | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted.

FAIL: 4 regressions: 28 progressions

regressions.sum:
                === gcc tests ===

Running gcc:gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp ...
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 x == 10 - i
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 y == 20 - 2 * i
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54693-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 21 z == 30 - 3 * i


progressions.sum:
                === gcc tests ===

Running gcc:gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 34 c == &a[0]
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -O2  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 39 c == &a[0]
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 39 c == 
&a[0]
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 39 c == &a[0]
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin 
-fno-fat-lto-objects  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 39 c == &a[0]
... and 24 more entries

You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1962/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make 
commands are in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1962/artifact/artifacts/notify/
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1962/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail

The configuration of this build is:
CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm

-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:

Current build   : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1962/artifact/artifacts
Reference build : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1961/artifact/artifacts

Reproduce last good and first bad builds: 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c7e8a8d814229fd6fc4c16c2452f15dddc613479/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt

Full commit : 
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c7e8a8d814229fd6fc4c16c2452f15dddc613479

List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
* tcwg_gcc_check
** master-arm
*** FAIL: 4 regressions: 28 progressions
*** 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/c7e8a8d814229fd6fc4c16c2452f15dddc613479/tcwg_gcc_check/master-arm/details.txt
*** 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1962/artifact/artifacts

Reply via email to