[gdal-dev] Unsupported SRS but available in epsg file

2009-11-17 Thread Guillaume Sueur
Hi, Don't want to bother you guys, but I'm running into an unsupported SRS problem I haven't been able to solve on my own for the past hours... I'm running geodjango on a legacy server, which is said to be running Fedora 9, with standard packages for this distro : gdal-1.5.3-1.fc9.i386 proj-4.5.0

Re: [gdal-dev] Unsupported SRS but available in epsg file

2009-11-17 Thread Jean-Claude REPETTO
Guillaume Sueur a écrit : I have added to that file the famous 900913 definition When I try to create a SpatialReference with 900913 code, I run into a SRSException: Unsupported SRS Any hint would be appreciated ! Hi Guillaume, Have you tried EPSG:3857, which is the official EPSG number fo

Re: [gdal-dev] Unsupported SRS but available in epsg file

2009-11-17 Thread Guillaume Sueur
I know it's the official one, but since it has been introduced in proj 4.7 (the server is running 4.5) and OpenLayers still defines it as 900913, no chance to get it work with 3857 ! Le mardi 17 novembre 2009 à 11:33 +0100, Jean-Claude REPETTO a écrit : > Guillaume Sueur a écrit : > > I have ad

Re: [gdal-dev] Unsupported SRS but available in epsg file

2009-11-17 Thread Even Rouault
Selon Guillaume Sueur : Guillaume, I agree that understanding what is the OGR responsibility and what is proj.4 responsability is not always obvious ;-) When you use "EPSG:" or "+init=EPSG:x" as a SRS definition, OGR will try to resolve the EPSG code from its own CSV data files, and thus

Re: [gdal-dev] Unsupported SRS but available in epsg file

2009-11-17 Thread Guillaume Sueur
Le mardi 17 novembre 2009 à 14:48 +0100, Even Rouault a écrit : > Selon Guillaume Sueur : > > Guillaume, > > I agree that understanding what is the OGR responsibility and what is proj.4 > responsability is not always obvious ;-) > > When you use "EPSG:" or "+init=EPSG:x" as a SRS definit

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL installing about building openev

2009-11-17 Thread Randy
> Randy, > > I think you already received other replies, but I think the problem is > that an earlier step select gtkgl as a library but without actually > checking properly if it was available and now the GDAL test fails because > it also tries to include previous dependencies like gtkgl. > > S