Frank,
On 16 April 2010 19:25, Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com wrote:
Jose Gomez-Dans wrote:
Running gdalinfo -stats on the new filename proceeds reporting the
expected information, band by band... slowly but surely, until it reaches
band 33 (it's band 33 everytime, even with different
Hi list,
I’d like to know whether ogr2ogr could convert s57 files to ERSI shape
file(.shp)?
I got some errors during converting:
ERROR 6:Can’t create fields of type StringList on shapefile layers.
…
Same as above
ERROR 1：Attempt to write non-polygon LINESTRING geometry to type
shapefile
Randy wrote:
Hi list,
I’d like to know whether ogr2ogr could convert s57 files to ERSI shape
file(.shp)?
I got some errors during converting:
ERROR 6:Can’t create fields of type StringList on shapefile layers.
…
Same as above
ERROR 1：Attempt to write non-polygon LINESTRING
I am trying to convert data from postgis to a .tab file using ogr2ogr
with partial success.
Thanks to Frank Frank W I have understood how the format stores the
coordinates and that their precision depends on the mao extent.
The data is in MOLDREF99 projection and I want to define it's extents
to
Sorry if this has been brought up before, but was anyone planning to add
a raster driver for the HF2/HFZ format? Specs are at
www.bundysoft.com/docs/doku.php?id=l3dt:formats:specs:hf2
Ray
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
William McCoy wrote:
I have recently built and installed gdal 1.7.1 on a couple of my Linux
computers. I have noticed that 'make' and 'make install' don't seem to
build or install any documentation as man pages or anything else. I
don't see any target in the makefile that I should use to
On 04/17/2010 02:17 PM, Lucena, Ivan wrote:
William McCoy wrote:
I have recently built and installed gdal 1.7.1 on a couple of my Linux
computers. I have noticed that 'make' and 'make install' don't seem to
build or install any documentation as man pages or anything else. I
don't see any target
Hi Frank,
Thanks for your response!
The first message indicates that there are some fields of
a type that cannot be translated to shapefiles directly. With
-skipfailures they should be just skipped.
The second message is caused when an S-57 layer has a mixture
of geometry types.
Randy wrote:
Hi Frank,
Thanks for your response!
The first message indicates that there are some fields of
a type that cannot be translated to shapefiles directly. With
-skipfailures they should be just skipped.
The second message is caused when an S-57 layer has a mixture
of geometry types.
