Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Even, I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed yet) in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable in method signatures in favour of using the respective interfaces (List and Map). Daniele can add more as needed... As you mentioned this

[gdal-dev] Re: several No data value

2010-12-10 Thread ludovic
Thanks Frank for these remarks. I work on pds driver (in fact the subdriver ISIS2). I agree with you that some folks would want to distinguish the various kinds of nodata values. And it's the reason i would like the default behaviour is we have various no data value but we can add a flag option

[gdal-dev] Gdal_translate, WMS source and own certificate

2010-12-10 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Hi, We would like to use gdal_translate for reading fromn our WMS service which is secured by our own certificate and thus not automatically trusted. Our developer had a quick look on a gdal source code and tried to find how options CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER (1) and CURLOPT_CAPATH (2) are used

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Ivan Lucena
Ciao Simone, Salut Even, You guy did a great job improving the performance of reading and writing pixels buffer. http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=gdal-dev%40lists.osgeo.orgq=ReadRaster_Direct But, With great power comes great responsibility. Now we find users asking for changes that are

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Ivan, well, what you are suggesting (deprecation/removal) cycle is a standard policy within the porjects we have been involved, therefore I am in favour of it. It is a natural way for having an API evolving. On the other hand GDAL is well known for the rock solid stability of its API, but

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 10:27:49, Simone Giannecchini a écrit : Ciao Even, I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed yet) in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable in method signatures in favour of using the respective interfaces