Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 1.8 - Switch Thrown

2011-01-30 Thread Ari Jolma
29.1.2011 20:43, Tamas Szekeres kirjoitti: Ari, I would be eager to know the exact use case you have. Did you have some errors provided by the linker in this case? For the stdcall functions I added entries like this _CPLDefaultErrorHandler@12 CPLDefaultErrorHandler =

[gdal-dev] Bogus gml:Face interpretation

2011-01-30 Thread strk
Hello, I'm writing GML output routines for Topologically-defined features in PostGIS and found what I think is a bug in how ogr interprets the gml:Face tag contents. Take this topology: n1 +-e1---. | | | F1 | | n3 | | ,-e2--+| | |

Re: [gdal-dev] Bogus gml:Face interpretation

2011-01-30 Thread Chaitanya kumar CH
strk, Thank you very much for pointing out the errors. I could blame it on the lack of enough sample data but that's just laziness. I should have read the specifications more throughly. I see your first point but I need to dig deeper for the second. Please file a ticket at

Re: [gdal-dev] Bogus gml:Face interpretation

2011-01-30 Thread Even Rouault
Hi Sandro, CC'ing Chaitanya who implemented the reading of topological GML3 elements. Le dimanche 30 janvier 2011 12:09:12, strk a écrit : Hello, I'm writing GML output routines for Topologically-defined features in PostGIS and found what I think is a bug in how ogr interprets the gml:Face

Re: [gdal-dev] Bogus gml:Face interpretation

2011-01-30 Thread strk
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 01:24:08PM +0100, Even Rouault wrote: Le dimanche 30 janvier 2011 12:09:12, strk a écrit : n1 +-e1---. | F1 | | n3 | | ,-e2--+| | | F2 || | +--e7-'| | n4| `e2+

Re: [gdal-dev] Bogus gml:Face interpretation

2011-01-30 Thread strk
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:53:20PM +0530, Chaitanya kumar CH wrote: Thank you very much for pointing out the errors. I could blame it on the lack of enough sample data but that's just laziness. I should have read the specifications more throughly. I noticed primarly because the GDAL

Re: [gdal-dev] Licensing Policy for drivers and applications

2011-01-30 Thread Frank Warmerdam
On 11-01-29 06:16 PM, Even Rouault wrote: 1) I had a strange feeling when I read that In the absence of a user or application level policy, default to a policy of PREFER_PROPRIETARY. It sounds a bit paradoxical for an open source library... I guess that on Linux, it should be PREFER_RECIPROCAL

Re: [gdal-dev] Licensing Policy for drivers and applications

2011-01-30 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 30 janvier 2011 18:00:19, Frank Warmerdam a écrit : b) For MySQL, it depends on whether you use the open source version (GPL) or the commercial version. Really? I had assumed that the client libraries would have been under a non-reciprocal license even if the database server

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 1.8 - Switch Thrown

2011-01-30 Thread Tamas Szekeres
Ari, Assuming you did mention to compile the Perl bindings with MinGW could you describe the steps of the compilation in more detail? (by using the files downloaded from http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk.) Which packages should be installed as the prerequisites of the compilation? I admit I'm not an

[gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 1.8 Java Bindings for Windows Updated

2011-01-30 Thread Frank Warmerdam
Folks, I have updated the gdal-java package for OSGeo4W to be 1.8. I have also rewritten the building Java bindings on windows topic in the GDAL Trac to reflect how things work. I have only minimally tested the new package so feel free to let me know if there are problems. Best regards, --

Re: [gdal-dev] Licensing Policy for drivers and applications

2011-01-30 Thread Tamas Szekeres
2011/1/30 Even Rouault even.roua...@mines-paris.org On Windows, I think that the actual license of the odbc library doesn't really count as people won't distribute the windows odbc system library right ? Otherwise it would make it impossible to distribute GPL software on Windows since the

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 1.8 - Switch Thrown

2011-01-30 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Ari, On Sun, 30. Jan 2011 at 11:36:49 +0200, Ari Jolma wrote: to the .def file. I create the .dll.a, which is the import library, with dlltool from the .def. Did you try to link the gdal_c_i.lib instead of generating your own library from the DLL? That what I do with GRASS. Works

Re: [gdal-dev] JPEG compressed GeoTIFF ignores Nodata

2011-01-30 Thread Even Rouault
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 22:40:20, Marius Jigmond a écrit : The link should work for another day or so (automatic server purge). I can re-upload it if you don't get the chance to download it. Warning: 1.2GB. https://www.twdb.state.tx.us/filetxfr/emaillinkdownload.aspx?id=FileTransf