This sounds great. Thanks so much Tamas.
Isaac
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
> I'm just working on to include that in the builds at
> http://www.gisinternals.com/sdk/
>
> Unfortunately I always have to patch the python-distutils stuff from
> versions to versions so as t
I'm just working on to include that in the builds at
http://www.gisinternals.com/sdk/
Unfortunately I always have to patch the python-distutils stuff from
versions to versions so as to make it work with all the supported
compilers...
Best regards,
Tamas
2011/7/9 Isaac Gerg
> Do you guys know
Frank,
thx for response.
But unfortunately I have not well explained.
My GML has not one only class but instead it has many classes.
Some classes has geometry and some other classes has not geometry.
So I cannot set it manually to wkbnone because only some classes need to
be translated to dbf o
I see -- you're right about QGIS.
I'm mostly using imagery for static or motion graphics, so my workflow
ends up in graphics software like Photoshop, After Effects and other
video, which all tend to handle imagery in roughly the same way. So I
think I'll just have to do the translation to no a
Hi,
is compliant with the gdal/ogr rules to have a GML driver to export
forward a dbf when in the GML there is a class without geometry ?
Actually the GML drivers when meet a class without geometry export it as
a shapefile having null geometry.
Thx,
Andrea Peri
Do you guys know when 3.2 will be supported? How do I build from 3.2
currently using the patches you mentioned -- are there instructions
anywhere?
Thanks in advance,
Isaac
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le samedi 09 juillet 2011 13:56:54, Tamas Szekeres a écrit :
> > 2011
Folks,
Somewhat belatedly I have prepared 1.8.1RC2 at:
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal-1.8.1RC2.tar.gz
http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/gdal181RC2.zip
Please test and report issues. I will raise a motion to approve
it shortly after I have done some minimal testing.
Best regards,
--
Le samedi 09 juillet 2011 13:56:54, Tamas Szekeres a écrit :
> 2011/7/8 Even Rouault
>
> > http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/ proposes bindings for 2.6, 2.7 and 3.1.
> > Perhaps
> > Tamas would want to add support for 3.2 ?
>
> How do we stand with the Python 3.2 support in GDAL? Do we still require t
2011/7/8 Even Rouault
>
> http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/ proposes bindings for 2.6, 2.7 and 3.1.
> Perhaps
> Tamas would want to add support for 3.2 ?
>
>
How do we stand with the Python 3.2 support in GDAL? Do we still require to
patch the gererated interface files so as to compile the bindings
su
