Re: [gdal-dev] Re: help for comparing two WKT

2011-10-08 Thread Even Rouault
Le dimanche 09 octobre 2011 01:05:21, Etienne Tourigny a écrit : > Thanks Even > > I see what you mean, several named GEOGCS/datums can match a given > spheroid. > > I am trying to see if I can assign a named datum given spheroid > parameters from the CF Convention for the netcdf driver. > > For

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: help for comparing two WKT

2011-10-08 Thread Etienne Tourigny
Thanks Even I see what you mean, several named GEOGCS/datums can match a given spheroid. I am trying to see if I can assign a named datum given spheroid parameters from the CF Convention for the netcdf driver. For example, this CF definition corresponds to the WGS84 datum/GEOGCS int crs ;

Re: [gdal-dev] sandbox access for non-commiters

2011-10-08 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 08/10/11 10:14, Antonio Valentino wrote: > Il 07/10/2011 22:36, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: >> On 06/10/11 22:27, Antonio Valentino wrote: >>> >>> Another option is to make available a pre-loaded git repo in compressed >>> form. >>> Developers that want to use git should download and uncompress t

Re: [gdal-dev] TRI, TPI, and Ruggedness

2011-10-08 Thread Joaquim Luis
Hi, Mirone has those same block algorithms (and more, like slope by fitting a bilinear surface) and let change the the box size. Joaquim Evan, Thanks for the info. Jay On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Even Rouault mailto:even.roua...@mines-paris.org>> wrote: Le samedi 08 octobre 2

Re: [gdal-dev] TRI, TPI, and Ruggedness

2011-10-08 Thread Jay L.
Evan, Thanks for the info. Jay On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > Le samedi 08 octobre 2011 17:26:58, Jay L. a écrit : > > What is the box size on these indices (TRI, TPI, Roughness)? > > 3x3 window > > > Is it user modifiable? > > No > > > > > Finally, in your experience, w

Re: [gdal-dev] TRI, TPI, and Ruggedness

2011-10-08 Thread Even Rouault
Le samedi 08 octobre 2011 17:26:58, Jay L. a écrit : > What is the box size on these indices (TRI, TPI, Roughness)? 3x3 window > Is it user modifiable? No > > Finally, in your experience, which index have you selected for a specific > application and why? (Cross-posted this question to gis.st

[gdal-dev] TRI, TPI, and Ruggedness

2011-10-08 Thread Jay L.
What is the box size on these indices (TRI, TPI, Roughness)? Is it user modifiable? Finally, in your experience, which index have you selected for a specific application and why? (Cross-posted this question to gis.stackexchange.com) Thanks, Jay ___ gd

Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: gdal_merge.py - Missing images - sans attachment

2011-10-08 Thread Jay L.
I got this working this morning. Again, I simply need to explore the documentation better! My issue was not with format or projection, but with image size. My final mosaic kept hitting the 3.7GB mark, regardless of whether I used a .vrt, a GTiff, or worked with gdalwarp. Reading the GTiff drive

Re: [gdal-dev] Re: help for comparing two WKT

2011-10-08 Thread Even Rouault
Le samedi 08 octobre 2011 07:05:31, Etienne Tourigny a écrit : > A related question: > > given an unnamed datum with defined spheroid, PRIMEM and UNIT values, > is there a way to find a corresponding named datum or EPSG code? > You can find a match, but there are often several possible solutions

Re: [gdal-dev] sandbox access for non-commiters

2011-10-08 Thread Antonio Valentino
Hi Mateusz, Il 07/10/2011 22:36, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: > On 06/10/11 22:27, Antonio Valentino wrote: >> Il 06/10/2011 23:03, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto: >>> On 06/10/11 21:52, Antonio Valentino wrote: The weak point in the workflow is the initial cloning of the svn repo. >>> >>> Inde