Thanks Even,
This seems to be working. But unfortunately we have projection code in
several places, like
https://mapwingis.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#MapWinGIS/trunk/Processing/Projections.cppand
https://mapwingis.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#MapWinGIS/trunk/Grid/tkGridRaster.cpp(aroun
Hi Even,
Good points and vacuuming is also very important sometimes but but does not
suit at all for a creation option. I will think about some text and examples
that could be added into SQLite/Spatialite performance hints.
-Jukka-
Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
> I'm a bit ambivalent abou
Le samedi 25 janvier 2014 23:50:10, Paul Meems a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks to Tamas Szekeres we are now using his binaries from
> http://www.gisinternals.com/sdk/ with MapWinGIS, our mapping ActiveX.
> This has drastically simplified our build process and we are very grateful
> for Tamas' help.
Hi all,
Thanks to Tamas Szekeres we are now using his binaries from
http://www.gisinternals.com/sdk/ with MapWinGIS, our mapping ActiveX.
This has drastically simplified our build process and we are very grateful
for Tamas' help.
We're now struggling with some minor issues regarding our 'old' C++
Hi Jukka,
I'm a bit ambivalent about providing a creation option for that (although that
would not be an heresy). For a few reasons :
- it is relatively easy to create an attribute index manually (once you know
the syntax)
- it is not necessarily to create it at layer creation time
- it would po
Hi,
I guess that both SQLite/Spatialite and especially OGC Geopackage will be
used by people who consider them more like file formats than as datebases.
Such users may not know the power of indexes and they do not necessarily
know anything about SQL and such.
How about writing a few lines about t
Hi,
>>I can't see any rational reason for that... Just in case : are you sure you
>>are running the same GDAL lib and binary in the terminal and from Python ?
Yes, there's only one GDAL lib installed on the system - the default one that
can be installed from the Ubuntu package manager.
Anyway, I
Le vendredi 24 janvier 2014 23:03:24, Hermann Peifer a écrit :
> On 2014-01-24 17:22, Norman Vine wrote:
> > hmm
> >
> > this seems to be related to this fairly recent change
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3732
> > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Change-of-DECIMAL-PRECISION-
>
Le samedi 25 janvier 2014 00:47:45, John Abraham a écrit :
> Here’s a diff on the .dox for gdaldem, as a suggestion.
Applied, thanks.
> (I don’t want
> commit access on the repository. Is sending the diff by email the
> appropriate approach?)
For very short patches such as that one, it is OK.
