Re: [gdal-dev] Convention for class member names

On 30 November 2015 at 22:24, David Adler wrote: > In the gpkg code, the member names all appear to be prefixed with 'm_'. > > Is this a new convention? AFAIK, yes, but it looks like it's missing from https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc8_devguide Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateus

[gdal-dev] Convention for class member names

In the gpkg code, the member names all appear to be prefixed with 'm_'. Is this a new convention? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.o

Re: [gdal-dev] strange grid pattern when reprojecting

Hi, Sorry for being unclear, I meant a sample of source data that could be used for reproducing the issue, not a sample of output with a grid artifact. -Jukka Rahkonen- > Hi, > I've tried adding -et 0 and the grid feature is still there. Here is an > example: https://www.dropbox.com/s/teywuev