[gdal-dev] slow netCDF read times

2016-11-21 Thread Pablo Rozas Larraondo
Hello, I've come across some NetCDF4 files where GDAL is taking a surprisingly long time to read data from them. For example this is an example public file containing precipitation data: ftp://ftp.chg.ucsb.edu/pub/org/chg/products/CHIRPS-2.0/ global_dekad/netcdf/chirps-v2.0.2015.dekads.nc If I

[gdal-dev] Process MicaSense raw data using GDAL

2016-11-21 Thread Paul Meems
I'm investigating if we can process the raw data made by MicaSense using GDAL so we don't need to upload the data first and then get the multi-band GeoTiff back. The camera has 5 lenses maken 5 tiff-files each time. Each band (R, G, B, RedEx, NearInf) in its own file. Due to the direction and the

[gdal-dev] Antialiasing problem with gdaladdo at edges/nodata sections

2016-11-21 Thread Neumann, Andreas
Hi, I have Orthoimages where the boundaries aren't rectangular, but they have corners and sometimes even diagonal edges. I noticed, that after creating pyramids/overview with gdaladdo, that I get antialiasing/rendering artefacts that aren't present in the original image at full resolution. See

Re: [gdal-dev] Unable to extract features from KML

2016-11-21 Thread Michael Z Freeman
Hi, Thanks for this ! I eventually realised that I'd got in a muddle because I had failed to understand what "wkb_geometry" is ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_text ). I think I thought it was the gdal way for setting the SRID or something like this. So after seeing the light I am

Re: [gdal-dev] CAD (DWG) Driver

2016-11-21 Thread Nigel Westbury
The DWG driver contribution is much appreciated. It currently supports older versions of files up to R1015 (AutoCAD 2000). The DWG format was relatively straight forward up to that version. In 2004 the format became rather more complex, including simple xor encryption and LZ77 compression of

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL and ElasticSearch 5.0

2016-11-21 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I've just tested and confirm that ES 5.0 isn't compatible of current driver. I've created https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6724 to track this. > Jukka: I'm testing the same, for starters it would be valuable to identify > which ES version(s) are supported in [1]. Looking at commit

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL and ElasticSearch 5.0

2016-11-21 Thread Kralidis, Tom (EC)
Jukka: I'm testing the same, for starters it would be valuable to identify which ES version(s) are supported in [1]. ..Tom [1] http://www.gdal.org/drv_elasticsearch.html From: gdal-dev [mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Rahkonen Jukka (MML) Sent: 21 November 2016 10:48

[gdal-dev] GDAL and ElasticSearch 5.0

2016-11-21 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, I tried to test new ElasticSearch version with no success and I wonder what is wrong. My command and debug data follows. ogr2ogr -f "ElasticSearch" http://localhost:9200 -s_srs epsg:3067 -t_srs epsg:4326 test_es50.shp --debug on GDAL: GDALOpen(test_es50.shp, this=02454920)