Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Ari Jolma
Even Rouault kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 13:19: Hi Ari, It seems to me that the WCS driver could benefit from some love. That would be a good initiative! In the wished feature list, I could add: * improve test coverage, which is really low currently: https://rawgit.com/rouault/gdalautotest-cove

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Even Rouault
> Is there any reason not to switch to libxml2 from minixml? > > I see only GMLAS driver uses libxml2 currently Ah, yes indirectly when it validates the data/gmlasconf.xml file against data/gmlasconf.xsd, since CPLValidateXML() uses libxml2 underneath to do that (it could actually have an alt

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Edzer Pebesma
On 10/23/2017 08:47 PM, Even Rouault wrote: > On lundi 23 octobre 2017 18:31:58 CEST Ari Jolma wrote: >> Peter Baumann kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 18:01: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> splendid idea! Anybody who feels like working on WCS 2 support, feel free >>> to contact me or my group for any sort of explan

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Even Rouault
> The netcdf files I looked at through the GDAL driver had time and/or > depth offered as different gdal layers, and offered different variables > (i.e. different coverages) as subdatasets. Yes, although in the WCS case, a coverage can have several bands, and thus using the band mechanism to ref

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Ari Jolma
Even Rouault kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 13:28: > The netcdf files I looked at through the GDAL driver had time and/or > depth offered as different gdal layers, and offered different variables > (i.e. different coverages) as subdatasets. Yes, although in the WCS case, a coverage can have several

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Ari Jolma
Whoa! How hard can XML be? I have a real Capabilities document (from well known company) which defines *both* default and ows namespace to http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0. Thus, to be sure, I need to look for *both* ows:ServiceIdentification and ServiceIdentification. Or maybe loop through all

[gdal-dev] Multidimensional raster support in GDAL

2017-10-24 Thread Edzer Pebesma
I changed the subject, which was "WCS driver"; although it is still relevant for the WCS driver, it's really about GDAL's abstraction. On 10/24/2017 12:41 PM, Ari Jolma wrote: > Even Rouault kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 13:28: >> >>   >> >> > The netcdf files I looked at through the GDAL driver had ti

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Peter Baumann
FWIW, OWS Common 2.0 is known to be flawed in several aspects (we spec writers suffered dearly - from the resources it needed to discover, to finding workarounds in the spec, to explaining to people...). Trust me, the namespace issue is just a minor one in comparison... OGC is looking to get someth

Re: [gdal-dev] WCS driver

2017-10-24 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 24 octobre 2017 17:07:51 CEST Ari Jolma wrote: > Whoa! How hard can XML be? I have a real Capabilities document (from > well known company) which defines *both* default and ows namespace to > http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0. > > Thus, to be sure, I need to look for *both* ows:ServiceIdenti

[gdal-dev] GDAL and ESRI Compact Cache

2017-10-24 Thread Helmut Kudrnovsky
hi, just seen [1] that Austrian basemap (incl. orthofotos) is now offered as ESRI Compact Cache. anyone any experience to read this format by GDAL? kind regards Helmut [1] https://www.basemap.at/#offline ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL and ESRI Compact Cache

2017-10-24 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 24 octobre 2017 20:33:34 CEST Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote: >hi, > >just seen [1] that Austrian basemap (incl. orthofotos) is now offered as ESRI >Compact Cache. > >anyone any experience to read this format by GDAL? > >kind regards >Helmut > >[1] https://www.basemap.at/#offline There's some h