Even Rouault kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 13:19:
Hi Ari,
It seems to me that the WCS driver could benefit from some love.
That would be a good initiative!
In the wished feature list, I could add:
* improve test coverage, which is really low currently:
https://rawgit.com/rouault/gdalautotest-cove
> Is there any reason not to switch to libxml2 from minixml?
>
> I see only GMLAS driver uses libxml2 currently
Ah, yes indirectly when it validates the data/gmlasconf.xml file against
data/gmlasconf.xsd,
since CPLValidateXML() uses libxml2 underneath to do that (it could actually
have an
alt
On 10/23/2017 08:47 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
> On lundi 23 octobre 2017 18:31:58 CEST Ari Jolma wrote:
>> Peter Baumann kirjoitti 23.10.2017 klo 18:01:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> splendid idea! Anybody who feels like working on WCS 2 support, feel free
>>> to contact me or my group for any sort of explan
> The netcdf files I looked at through the GDAL driver had time and/or
> depth offered as different gdal layers, and offered different variables
> (i.e. different coverages) as subdatasets.
Yes, although in the WCS case, a coverage can have several bands, and thus
using the band
mechanism to ref
Even Rouault kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 13:28:
> The netcdf files I looked at through the GDAL driver had time and/or
> depth offered as different gdal layers, and offered different variables
> (i.e. different coverages) as subdatasets.
Yes, although in the WCS case, a coverage can have several
Whoa! How hard can XML be? I have a real Capabilities document (from
well known company) which defines *both* default and ows namespace to
http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0.
Thus, to be sure, I need to look for *both* ows:ServiceIdentification
and ServiceIdentification. Or maybe loop through all
I changed the subject, which was "WCS driver"; although it is still
relevant for the WCS driver, it's really about GDAL's abstraction.
On 10/24/2017 12:41 PM, Ari Jolma wrote:
> Even Rouault kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 13:28:
>>
>>
>>
>> > The netcdf files I looked at through the GDAL driver had ti
FWIW, OWS Common 2.0 is known to be flawed in several aspects (we spec writers
suffered dearly - from the resources it needed to discover, to finding
workarounds in the spec, to explaining to people...). Trust me, the namespace
issue is just a minor one in comparison... OGC is looking to get someth
On mardi 24 octobre 2017 17:07:51 CEST Ari Jolma wrote:
> Whoa! How hard can XML be? I have a real Capabilities document (from
> well known company) which defines *both* default and ows namespace to
> http://www.opengis.net/ows/2.0.
>
> Thus, to be sure, I need to look for *both* ows:ServiceIdenti
hi,
just seen [1] that Austrian basemap (incl. orthofotos) is now offered as ESRI
Compact Cache.
anyone any experience to read this format by GDAL?
kind regards
Helmut
[1] https://www.basemap.at/#offline
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo
On mardi 24 octobre 2017 20:33:34 CEST Helmut Kudrnovsky wrote:
>hi,
>
>just seen [1] that Austrian basemap (incl. orthofotos) is now offered as ESRI
>Compact Cache.
>
>anyone any experience to read this format by GDAL?
>
>kind regards
>Helmut
>
>[1] https://www.basemap.at/#offline
There's some h
11 matches
Mail list logo