I have a question that is probably more "user" than "developer". Is there
different place that I should post my question?
I don't think that I understand -srcnodata. I assume that -srcnodata "0 0
0" on a 3 band image means that all 3 bands have to be 0 to be "no data"
but I think what I'm seeing
On mercredi 28 mars 2018 17:58:37 CEST Raphael Das Gupta wrote:
> On 28.03.2018 16:31, Marcos Dione wrote:
> > in my opinion, gdal_merge should be used only if the merged version
> >
> > will be used for more things or if you're going to use it with something
> > that doesn't know how to read
On 28.03.2018 16:31, Marcos Dione wrote:
> in my opinion, gdal_merge should be used only if the merged version
> will be used for more things or if you're going to use it with something
> that doesn't know how to read the .vrt files (i.e., is not using gdal).
Even then it seems to be faster to
Hi Even,
Thanks, after updating my GDAL to a more recent 2.3.0dev version ogrinfo indeed
shows that information.
-Jukka-
Lähettäjä: Even Rouault
Lähetetty: 28. maaliskuuta 2018 17:47
Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
On mercredi 28 mars 2018 14:28:14 CEST Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> Hi,
> On page https://www.mapbox.com/help/define-mbtiles/ there is a link into
> https://www.mapbox.com/help/data/trails.mbtiles
>
> My GDAL 2.3.0dev does list MBTiles as a supported format but it can't still
> open this
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:28:57PM +0200, Raphael Das Gupta wrote:
> On 27.03.2018 22:56, Ian Reese wrote:
> > Maybe this is a bug or am I using gdal_merge.py improperly.
> I've recently become unsure whether (and when) gdal_merge.py should be
> used at all, or whether gdalbuildvrt followed by
Hi,
On page https://www.mapbox.com/help/define-mbtiles/ there is a link into
https://www.mapbox.com/help/data/trails.mbtiles
My GDAL 2.3.0dev does list MBTiles as a supported format but it can't still
open this database
gdalinfo trails.mbtiles
ERROR 4: `trails.mbtiles' not recognized as a
On mercredi 28 mars 2018 15:05:34 CEST Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Even Rouault wrote:
> > The identification logic of drivers is supposed to operate fast
> >
> > (extension based, or on the content of the first kilobyte of the header),
>
> If I understand correctly Frank
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, Even Rouault wrote:
The identification logic of drivers is supposed to operate fast
(extension based, or on the content of the first kilobyte of the header),
If I understand correctly Frank Warmerdam did not favour extension based
file identification:
On lundi 12 mars 2018 05:55:10 CEST Ian Reese wrote:
> No matter which variation of merge I run, those regions that once contained
> 'nodata' or '-' are converted to '0' and the nodata value is not
> retained after the merge. When I load the test_merge_wnodata.tif into
> QGIS, those regions
Hi Ian, heya GDALers
On 27.03.2018 22:56, Ian Reese wrote:
> Maybe this is a bug or am I using gdal_merge.py improperly.
I've recently become unsure whether (and when) gdal_merge.py should be
used at all, or whether gdalbuildvrt followed by gdaltranslate or
gdalwarp is always preferable. (Also
11 matches
Mail list logo