Re: [gdal-dev] _gdal.FillNodata not Python function

2018-04-19 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 4/19/2018 8:56 AM, mattijn wrote: Dear, I've the same error/bug appearing. Also using the GDAL python package (GDAL‑2.2.4‑cp35‑cp35m‑win_amd64.whl) from https://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#gdal Regards, Mattijn The pointer comparison for the `gdal.TermProgress` Python/SWIG

Re: [gdal-dev] _gdal.FillNodata not Python function

2018-04-19 Thread mattijn
Dear, I've the same error/bug appearing. Also using the GDAL python package (GDAL‑2.2.4‑cp35‑cp35m‑win_amd64.whl) from https://www.lfd.uci.edu/~gohlke/pythonlibs/#gdal Regards, Mattijn -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html

Re: [gdal-dev] Quete_string_fields creation option for CSV

2018-04-19 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Even Rouault wrote: Re: [gdal-dev] Quete_string_fields creation option for CSV   > Actually I've reworked this to be   > STRING_QUOTING=IF_NEEDED/IF_AMBIGUOUS/ALWAYS (Starting with GDAL 2.3): > whether to double-quote strings. IF_AMBIGUOUS means that string values that > look like numbers will

Re: [gdal-dev] Quete_string_fields creation option for CSV

2018-04-19 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 18 avril 2018 23:43:11 CEST Even Rouault wrote: > On mercredi 18 avril 2018 20:48:12 CEST Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > See this > > https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/279960/ogr2ogr-create-csv-with-str > > i > > ngs-wrapped-in-double-quotes > > > > The GDAL CSV

[gdal-dev] Warping EUMetsat MSG-4 MPE dataset to webmercator projection

2018-04-19 Thread Menno van Scheers - HUSS
Hi, Built version 2.2.4 of gdal with no additional libraries. Currently trying to warp a grib dataset to webmercator projection with the following arguments : gdalwarp -t_srs "+proj=geos +lon_0=0 +h=35785831 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +a=6378140 +b=6356755 +units=m +no_defs"

[gdal-dev] ogr2ogr projection issues

2018-04-19 Thread William Roper
Hi all, I've been doing what i thought was a fairly routine merging of shapefiles and have encountered some unexpected projection issues. If I fail to define a target srs (-t_srs flag) then the features end up overlaying each other. I describe the issue in much more detail along with screen