On dimanche 3 mars 2019 01:58:08 CET Jeremy Palmer wrote:
> I've now found this useful Mapserver wiki page
> https://github.com/mapserver/mapserver/wiki/Render-images-straight-out-of-S3
> -with-the-vsicurl-driver. It seems to imply that it's better to merge a
> collection of dataset tiles into a
There are multiple advantages to using s3 over ebs. First is availability. S3
is highly available (and replicated). EBS is limited to the single volume and
is much more fragile. EBS is also more expensive for storage than S3. And S3 is
available to multiple instances, EBS is not, it can only be
What are the advantages of storing the imagery in S3 as opposed to EBS? I'm
using the throughput optimized magnetic EBS which I is a little less
expensive than S3. I did some testing a couple years ago and didn't see
enough performance gain to justify SSD. Have you tested S3 against any of
the EBS
