[gdal-dev] 3D transformation of DSM

2019-05-20 Thread Aurelien Vila
Hello All, I have to transform a DSM from a local CRS such as those produced by the trimble site calibration process ( : https://help.trimblegeospatial.com/TrimbleAccess/2018.10/en/Calibration.htm), to WGS84 ellipsoidal coordinates. The local CRS is defined by a projection (in this case transverse

Re: [gdal-dev] Building GDAL 3.0.0 with Proj 6.0.0

2019-05-20 Thread joshl
Looking at the solution on https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/BuildingOnUnixGDAL25dev I was only able to build proj 6 as a static library. There was an error when I tried to use --enable-shared=yes: -Wl,libproj.so.15 -o .libs/libproj.so.15.1.0 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: /home/loshjawrence/clones

[gdal-dev] Does /vsis3 work for HDF4?

2019-05-20 Thread Joe Lee
Hi, I have a quick question. I know that /vsis3 work for HDF5. How about HDF4? Does /vsis3 also work for HDF4? Regards, ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Re: [gdal-dev] Does /vsis3 work for HDF4?

2019-05-20 Thread James McClain
Hello, I don't believe that it does currently. Originally, support for HDF5 and NetCDF both used the cpl_userfaultfd mechanism https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/master/gdal/port/cpl_userfaultfd.cpp). The thing that prevented HDF4 from using that mechanism was that its underlying library did not

Re: [gdal-dev] Building GDAL 3.0.0 with Proj 6.0.0

2019-05-20 Thread joshl
Trying to go through the instructions as-is (apt-get install sqlite3 bin and lib, rename proj's .so libs, run patchelf, etc.) from https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/BuildingOnUnixGDAL25dev The gdal configure script is still unable to find proj. Looking through the config.log, I see there are two -l

[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx

2019-05-20 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, I believe we are now in a state where the prototype new website is functional and should have content at least equivalent to the current one, so I motion to adopt RFC74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc74_sphinx --- Starting with my +1 Even

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx

2019-05-20 Thread Kurt Schwehr
+1 KurtS On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:55 PM Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > I believe we are now in a state where the prototype new website is > functional > and should have content at least equivalent to the current one, so I > motion to > adopt RFC74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx: > > https:/

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx

2019-05-20 Thread Howard Butler
+1 Howard > On May 20, 2019, at 5:52 PM, Kurt Schwehr wrote: > > +1 KurtS > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:55 PM Even Rouault > wrote: > Hi, > > I believe we are now in a state where the prototype new website is functional > and should have content at least eq

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx

2019-05-20 Thread Daniel Morissette
+1 Daniel On 2019-05-20 16:54, Even Rouault wrote: Hi, I believe we are now in a state where the prototype new website is functional and should have content at least equivalent to the current one, so I motion to adopt RFC74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx: https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx

2019-05-20 Thread Norman Barker
+1 Norman On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:59 PM Daniel Morissette wrote: > +1 > > Daniel > > On 2019-05-20 16:54, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I believe we are now in a state where the prototype new website is > functional > > and should have content at least equivalent to the current one, so I

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx

2019-05-20 Thread jratike80
+1 -Jukka- Even Rouault-2 wrote > Hi, > > I believe we are now in a state where the prototype new website is > functional > and should have content at least equivalent to the current one, so I > motion to > adopt RFC74: Migrate gdal.org to Sphinx: > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/r