Re: [gdal-dev] python GDAL issue

2019-11-05 Thread Brad Hards
Hi Adam, https://github.com/codice/imaging-nitf/pull/196 is the work I did for my java implementation. The spec definition I came up should be directly applicable. However for it to work in GDAL, we need at least: * Support for parsing / using the IEEE 754 encoding (which I calle

Re: [gdal-dev] process for adding commits to minor release

2019-11-05 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Hi On 11/5/19 9:54 PM, Even Rouault wrote: On mardi 5 novembre 2019 14:48:19 CET Norman Barker wrote: Hi, I was looking at the recent 3.0.2 release and it was missing a few of my commits for the TileDB driver dating back to June. How do I get these added to the 3.0.x series, I understood the b

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC76 OGR Python drivers

2019-11-05 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 12:06, Even Rouault wrote: > > This is a topic we already discussed a couple years ago. Please find a RFC > about it in: > > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/1984/files I dropped some comments there, not a review though. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.lo

Re: [gdal-dev] Removing default nodata value from netCDF driver ?

2019-11-05 Thread Julien Demaria
Thanks Even! De : Even Rouault [even.roua...@spatialys.com] Envoyé : mardi 5 novembre 2019 18:07 À : Julien Demaria Cc : gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Objet : Re: [gdal-dev] Removing default nodata value from netCDF driver ? On mardi 5 novembre 2019 15:41:47 CE

Re: [gdal-dev] process for adding commits to minor release

2019-11-05 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 5 novembre 2019 14:48:19 CET Norman Barker wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking at the recent 3.0.2 release and it was missing a few of my > commits for the TileDB driver dating back to June. How do I get these added > to the 3.0.x series, I understood the backport function to be for bug fixes?

[gdal-dev] process for adding commits to minor release

2019-11-05 Thread Norman Barker
Hi, I was looking at the recent 3.0.2 release and it was missing a few of my commits for the TileDB driver dating back to June. How do I get these added to the 3.0.x series, I understood the backport function to be for bug fixes? Norman ___ gdal-dev mai

Re: [gdal-dev] Open option for vectors in the cloud

2019-11-05 Thread Björn Harrtell
Improvements have hit master. I suspect there are some remaining bottlenecks though, but I currently lack the tests/means to investigate further in short term and will appreciate feedback. Den tors 31 okt. 2019 02:17Björn Harrtell skrev: > Thanks for trying out accessing FlatGeobuf via http. > >

Re: [gdal-dev] FileGDB & FID

2019-11-05 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 5 novembre 2019 13:16:36 CET Mike wrote: > I did end up just defining the layers and just adding all the data to it. > > However this does occur with ogr2ogr, and it says to use skip failures. > When I use that, I get one less feature (fails on the first I assume). You get that message b

Re: [gdal-dev] FileGDB & FID

2019-11-05 Thread Mike
I did end up just defining the layers and just adding all the data to it. However this does occur with ogr2ogr, and it says to use skip failures. When I use that, I get one less feature (fails on the first I assume). Is there a way to ignore FID with fgdb output & ogr2ogr? Same for the CopyLayer

[gdal-dev] FileGDB & FID

2019-11-05 Thread mike Null
I'm trying to create some features in a File GDB, and have that driver loaded. I've been doing something along the lines just fine to gpkg, but I hit a FileGDB issue and wondering how to get around it. This line in python lyr = fgdbds.CopyLayer(inmemorylayer,somename,['OVERWRITE=YES']) I get the

Re: [gdal-dev] Removing default nodata value from netCDF driver ?

2019-11-05 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 5 novembre 2019 15:41:47 CET Julien Demaria wrote: > Ok let's keep this for another PR. > > no_fill is not only a write side optimization because nc_inq_var_fill() can > be called when reading a file (the no_fill value is stored in the hidden > NetCDF attribute _NoFill, you can print it w

Re: [gdal-dev] Removing default nodata value from netCDF driver ?

2019-11-05 Thread Julien Demaria
Ok let's keep this for another PR. no_fill is not only a write side optimization because nc_inq_var_fill() can be called when reading a file (the no_fill value is stored in the hidden NetCDF attribute _NoFill, you can print it with ncdump -s but it is only set when nofill=true). My understandin

Re: [gdal-dev] Removing default nodata value from netCDF driver ?

2019-11-05 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 5 novembre 2019 14:08:33 CET Julien Demaria wrote: > Hi Even, > > Thanks for all the work. > I looked at the new pull request, it seems good but what do you think about > adding support for case where nc_inq_var_fill() returns no_fill=1? In this > case the current code uses fillvalue=zero

Re: [gdal-dev] NetCDF and ESA Probav issue with corner coordimates

2019-11-05 Thread Jacobs Tim
Dear Even, Ivan, Point taken on the self-consistency of the products. GeoTransform indeed appears incorrect, at least for NDVI. We'll cross-check for other products and either correct or remove GeoTransform. I noted in earlier reply that it doesn't impact GDAL's netCDF driver, as it looks at lon

Re: [gdal-dev] python GDAL issue

2019-11-05 Thread Edson, Adam Robert
Brad, Sorry it took so long to get back to you. I am interested in collaborating on this with you. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks! Adam From: Brad Hards Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 6:16 PM To: Edson, Adam Robert ; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Subject:

Re: [gdal-dev] NetCDF and ESA Probav issue with corner coordimates

2019-11-05 Thread Ivan Lucena
Even, That confirms my suspicious. The NetCDF driver is fine and there is nothing to be added or changed. > The products are not self consistent if you consider the crs:GeoTransform > property, > the documentation of the product and the actual values of the lon, lat arrays > ... > I think clari

Re: [gdal-dev] Removing default nodata value from netCDF driver ?

2019-11-05 Thread Julien Demaria
Hi Even, Thanks for all the work. I looked at the new pull request, it seems good but what do you think about adding support for case where nc_inq_var_fill() returns no_fill=1? In this case the current code uses fillvalue=zero by default (if I'm not wrong) which is not ideal, I think it is bett

Re: [gdal-dev] Update MVT

2019-11-05 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 5 novembre 2019 08:25:53 CET Travis Kirstine wrote: > Does the MVT driver support updates and the creation of multiple layers > using the -append -update methods No, it is one time creation only. To achieve what you want to do, you can typically create a input VRT file that has multiple

[gdal-dev] Update MVT

2019-11-05 Thread Travis Kirstine
Does the MVT driver support updates and the creation of multiple layers using the -append -update methods Something like: ogr2ogr -f MVT -dsco NAME=MyTiles -dsco DESCRIPTION="My Tileset Description " -dsco FORMAT=MBTILES -lco NAME=Layer1 -lco DESCRIPTION="My Layer Description" results.mbtiles lay

[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC76 OGR Python drivers

2019-11-05 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, This is a topic we already discussed a couple years ago. Please find a RFC about it in: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/1984/files Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-de

Re: [gdal-dev] Removing default nodata value from netCDF driver ?

2019-11-05 Thread Even Rouault
On mardi 5 novembre 2019 01:18:35 CET Julien Demaria wrote: > Hi Even, > > Are you sure that the driver uses a default fill value if the attribute is > not present? Yes, the raster band constructor systematically called SetNoDataValue() even if the bGotNoData flag was not set before. Thanks a l