l.
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Joaquim Luis wrote:
> Brian Murray wrote:
>>
>> I know. I left that on there in the mean time while I figured out the
>> translations. It wasn't even bending the map at all before. The
>> software just sees the image as a blob o
54993160055,-0.000475285171103)
>> Metadata:
>> AREA_OR_POINT=Area
>> TIFFTAG_SOFTWARE=Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
>> TIFFTAG_DATETIME=2009:02:21 16:15:49
>> TIFFTAG_XRESOLUTION=0
>> TIFFTAG_YRESOLUTION=0
>> TIFFTAG_RESOLUTIONUNIT=2 (pixels/inch)
&g
I finally have positive results, that I figured I should share here
(especially since this thread is already indexed on google...)
First, I created the world file for my map. I calculated the pixel
size by getting the number of pixels between each line of longitude. I
found this to be 65.5 (1 divi
00, 56.000) (115d 0'5.77"W, 54d 0'1.81"N)
Lower Right (-105.000, 54.000) (115d 0'5.77"W, 54d 0'1.75"N)
Center (-110.000, 55.000) (115d 0'6.04"W, 54d 0'1.78"N)
Band 1 Block=11696x1 Type=Byte, ColorInterp=Red
Band 2
Hm, so maybe that value is correct.
1/0.000854993160055 is 1169.56163712, which would mean its
about 1px per km.
I think I found an issue even before I warp:
gdal_translate -of gtiff -CO TFW=YES -a_ullr -115 56 -105 54 -a_srs
"+proj=lcc +lat_0=56 +lon_0=-115 +lat_2=49.33 +lat_1=54.66
>From the gdal_translate line, the images are identical, but with added
information to the tif, in a geotif style.
Once I warp it, the image is squished (as I would expect), but the
width is the same.
I have also tried embedding all of the geotiff data within the
intermediate image, but for some
I have a map that is in Lambert Conformal Conical, that I am
attempting to convert to something that is more "web friendly". That
is, vertical lines of longitude and straight lines of latitude,
hopefully with equal distance between latitudes. I have attempted to
use gdalwarp, but have had absolutel
