Hi,
Looks like the patch mentioned here https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4540 did
not make fully make it to the repository.
Lines 61-62 of frmts\wms\gdalwmscache.cpp should have been removed.
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
Software Engineer
T: +618 9217 3427
E: jacek.tom...@hexagongeospatial.com
Hexago
Also it does not look like WMS driver cleans the temp directory when it is
done. Is it expected?
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Tomaka, Jacek
Sent: Tuesday, 29 July 2014 10:28 AM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Blake, Even,
I played a bit with pull request #39. I enabled per dataset cache by setting
GDAL_DATASET_CACHING to YES. Awesome work!
Our application code opens file in GDAL and holds GDALDataset per thread.
Different threads can request same blocks but because cache should be per
dataset i expec
Blake, Even,
It looks like https://gist.github.com/flippmoke/16cd26a0247422f25840 improves
multi threaded access even in GDAL 1.11.
But as mentioned before I believe it is not thread safe ;) At least that is
what purists would say.
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
From: Tomaka, Jacek
Sent: Sunday, 30
Nicolas,
What version of ECW library are you using?
Is there any chance I could see the file(s)?
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Ragg
Sent: Friday, 17 April 2015 7:32 AM
To: g
-
From: Nicolas Ragg [mailto:ragg.g...@free.fr]
Sent: Friday, 17 April 2015 1:54 PM
To: Tomaka, Jacek; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Trouble with French Ecw map
Hello Jacek
I'm using gdal 1.11, binaries downloaded from gisinternals with the ref 1600
gdal_translate -fo
Hi,
What is the current status of RFC 47?
Is per dataset caching going to make it to GDAL 2.0?
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
___
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Message-
From: Even Rouault [mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2015 8:05 PM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: Tomaka, Jacek
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 47 Status.
Jacek,
>
> What is the current status of RFC 47?
Pending. IMHO the per-dataset block cache vs
?
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
-Original Message-
From: Even Rouault [mailto:even.roua...@spatialys.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2015 8:45 PM
To: Tomaka, Jacek
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 47 Status.
Le jeudi 07 mai 2015 14:20:42, Tomaka, Jacek a écrit :
> Even,
>
o:even.roua...@spatialys.com]
Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2015 9:20 PM
To: Tomaka, Jacek
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 47 Status.
Le jeudi 07 mai 2015 15:13:51, Tomaka, Jacek a écrit :
> Even,
>
> That makes sense to me.
> I will try to test your mutexing change
Jukka, Even,
Here is an example of ECW v2 with opacity.
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6028
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Even Rouault
Sent: Wednesday, 8 July 2015 8:08 PM
To: gd
HI Jonathan,
Have you tried compiling in ECW/JP2 support as a plugin?
Regards.
Jacek Tomaka
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev [mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Williams
Sent: Wednesday, 17 February 2016 4:51 AM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [gdal-de
Yves,
Have you tried ECW JPEG 2000 SDK 5.2 or 5.3? Is there a reason why you are
still using old 3.3 version?
Every version of the SDK contains quite a few improvements and we would also be
interested in learning about the problems encountered in the supported version
of the ECW Jp2 SDK.
Th
Not directly related to your question...
It would be quite useful to allow compilation of external libjpeg library with
dual 8_12 jpeg...
But it is being explicitly disabled by build scripts and code. i.e.
DUAL_MODE_8_12 is allowed only with internal libjpeg.
I have a version of GDAL with l
Hi,
Recently I tried to compile GDAL 1.10 with libjpeg + IPP 8.0.
I compiled IPP powered jpeglib 6b (taken from old IPP 7.0 samples, as IPP 8.0
examples contain version 8b).
I run into several issues, after some investigation it turned out that
different issues appear depending on the configura
15 matches
Mail list logo
