[gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 71: Migration to GitHub

2018-03-19 Thread Even Rouault
Hi, To follow our processes, I've initiated a RFC related to the migration to GitHub https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc71_github_migration In the hope to finally go from recuring discussions that have occured during the past years to a concrete end result, I've clearly simplified the process

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 71: Migration to GitHub

2018-03-19 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 19 March 2018 at 21:40, Even Rouault wrote: > Hi, > > To follow our processes, I've initiated a RFC related to the migration to > GitHub > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc71_github_migration A few comments: "5. The cron job on the OSGeo server that refreshes the website (...)" Perhaps,

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 71: Migration to GitHub

2018-03-19 Thread Even Rouault
> Perhaps, at some point this could move to gh-pages completely. > Possibly, I don't see any emergency for that. > "Most visible Trac wiki documentation will have to be revised to point > to GitHub?" I meant everywhere we mention svn, we should point to git/github. > > I think, this means the

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 71: Migration to GitHub

2018-03-19 Thread Mateusz Loskot
On 19 March 2018 at 22:17, Even Rouault wrote: >> >> "Most visible Trac wiki documentation will have to be revised to point >> to GitHub?" > > I meant everywhere we mention svn, we should point to git/github. > >> I think, this means the content is copied to GitHub wiki. > > I've not given any tho

Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion for RFC 71: Migration to GitHub

2018-03-19 Thread Ben Elliston
On 20/03/18 07:40, Even Rouault wrote: > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc71_github_migration +1 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev