DAL to get confused by files that can be supported
> > > > by
> >
> > driver
> >
> > > > A and B; and most important they want to process a very very large
> > > > number of files (ETL) or repeated times (WEB).
> > > >
> > >
; some
> > > drivers already haven a prefix like "HDF4:" and use it to select the
> > > driver. As you can see, the suggested code is not that pretty [
> > > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3043] since there is no Driver::Open
> > > method availab
; > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3043] since there is no Driver::Open
> > method available.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:36:08 +0200
> > > From: even.roua...@mines-paris.org
> > > To: lucena_i...@hotmai
On 15/05/2014 20:47, Even Rouault wrote:
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet ?
Or should I mo
Even,
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
>
> Best regards,
>
> Even
>
> --
> Geospatial professional services
> http://even.rouault.free.fr/s
Hi Etienne,
That sounds great!
Thanks to point that out.
Regards,
Ivan
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:25:13 -0300
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
From: etourigny@gmail.com
To: lucena_i...@hotmail.com
CC: even.roua...@mines-paris.org; gdal-dev
I went through the whole RFC and it looks great!
Even, this looks like an incredible amount of work and I wanted to thank you
for undertaking it.
Ragi
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Call-for-discussion-on-RFC-46-GDAL-OGR-unification
s you can see, the suggested code is not that pretty [
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3043] since there is no Driver::Open
> method available.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ivan
>
> > Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:36:08 +0200
> > From: even.roua...@mines-paris.org
> > To: lucen
g even more expensive.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> > > From: even.roua...@mines-paris.org
> > > To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> > > Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:47:32 +0200
> > > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/
> > related RFCs and should be reconsider for adoption since the unification
> > would make the probing even more expensive.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ivan
> >
> > > From: even.roua...@mines-paris.org
> > > To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
>
Thu, 15 May 2014 20:47:32 +0200
> > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
> >
> > Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR uni
Hi Nicolas,
> Hi list,
>
> I'm a little disappointed because I have hoped to find in version 2 a
> reinforcement (unification) of the semantics of operations against the
> reported capabilities (cf OGRLayer.TestCapability)
Apart from the below example, are you thinking to other things ?
RFC 46 i
014 20:47:32 +0200
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
>
> Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"
> >
> >
erdam
Envoyé : vendredi 16 mai 2014 04:03
À : Even Rouault
Cc : gdal dev
Objet : Re: [gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
Even,
I have (finally) looked over the RFC and I'm super pleased. I couldn't find
anything I wanted to argue against, and it all looks
Even,
I have (finally) looked over the RFC and I'm super pleased. I couldn't
find anything I wanted to argue against, and it all looks excellent to me
though I could imagine some some bumps in real world use.
Feel free to call for a motion when you are ready.
Best regards,
Frank
On Thu, May
Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
>
No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet ?
Or should I move that forward ?
But I'd prefer
Hi,
This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
Best regards,
Even
--
Geospatial professional services
http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
___
gdal-dev mailing li
17 matches
Mail list logo
