On mercredi 20 mars 2019 23:27:49 CET Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we have already more than 100 tickets open in github, I guess nobody no
> longer looks at old Trac tickets.
> I was wondering if we shouldn't mass close the remaining open tickets in
> Trac, with a message indicating that if th
On jeudi 21 mars 2019 08:45:35 CET Jeff McKenna wrote:
> +1
>
> But note that the Trac wiki pages are still used (and editable).
I only targetted tickets. Wiki pages will remain for now.
That said, with Howard during the next code sprint, we intend to experiment
moving GDAL documentation to Sphi
+1
But note that the Trac wiki pages are still used (and editable). I
remember this situation for MapServer, and for that I spent much effort
to manually create all of the existing Trac wiki pages, onto Github, by
hand (and then we made the Trac wiki read-only). This should be done
also for
+1
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:28 PM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we have already more than 100 tickets open in github, I guess nobody no
> longer looks at old Trac tickets.
> I was wondering if we shouldn't mass close the remaining open tickets in
> Trac,
> with a message indicating that if t
Hi,
As we have already more than 100 tickets open in github, I guess nobody no
longer looks at old Trac tickets.
I was wondering if we shouldn't mass close the remaining open tickets in Trac,
with a message indicating that if the issue is still current, it should be
filed on github, and assigni