I am still battleing this conversion. I was just informed, via IRC,
that gdal won't overwrite existing files, so I may have been making a
difference, but not knowing it. In any case, I tossed together a
simple script, that thus far, does nothing...
#!/bin/sh
rm -rf nn.tif n-merc.tif
echo '***
Brian,
The left side of your image contains a ... legend, so it's not part of the
map. How can any program guess what is legend and where the map starts?
Joaquim Luis
I am still battleing this conversion. I was just informed, via IRC,
that gdal won't overwrite existing files, so I may have
Brian Murray wrote:
I know. I left that on there in the mean time while I figured out the
translations. It wasn't even bending the map at all before. The
software just sees the image as a blob of data, that you have to tell
it how to transform, so it really didn't care that the map had a
legend
I have a map that is in Lambert Conformal Conical, that I am
attempting to convert to something that is more web friendly. That
is, vertical lines of longitude and straight lines of latitude,
hopefully with equal distance between latitudes. I have attempted to
use gdalwarp, but have had absolutely
From the gdal_translate line, the images are identical, but with added
information to the tif, in a geotif style.
Once I warp it, the image is squished (as I would expect), but the
width is the same.
I have also tried embedding all of the geotiff data within the
intermediate image, but for some
Hm, so maybe that value is correct.
1/0.000854993160055 is 1169.56163712, which would mean its
about 1px per km.
I think I found an issue even before I warp:
gdal_translate -of gtiff -CO TFW=YES -a_ullr -115 56 -105 54 -a_srs
+proj=lcc +lat_0=56 +lon_0=-115 +lat_2=49.33 +lat_1=54.66
