Selon William Kyngesburye :
> As I worked on a test case and fiddled around with a few other ideas, I think
> I found the error of my ways.
>
> The computer I was doing the conversion from vrt to PostGIS has GDAL 1.8. In
> my test case, GDAL 1.9 correctly preserves the FIDs. Was -preserve_fid
>
As I worked on a test case and fiddled around with a few other ideas, I think I
found the error of my ways.
The computer I was doing the conversion from vrt to PostGIS has GDAL 1.8. In
my test case, GDAL 1.9 correctly preserves the FIDs. Was -preserve_fid broken
in 1.8? I see the option list
William,
The correct formlation appears to be:
Fieldname
There are a few examples in:
autotest/ogr/data/vrt_test.vrt
Given that you already seem to have tried this I don't know why it
isn't working. If you can construct a simple case and file a ticket
it could perhaps be investigated.
Be
Any ideas on how I can get this to work? Or is it a limitation of the source
csv format?
On Apr 17, 2012, at 12:47 PM, William Kyngesburye wrote:
> I'm having trouble getting the FID option to work in a vrt. The help is not
> clear on how to do this. I've tried
>
> feature_id
>
> and
>
>
I'm having trouble getting the FID option to work in a vrt. The help is not
clear on how to do this. I've tried
feature_id
and
but ogrinfo will not show the FID column info.
-
William Kyngesburye
http://www.kyngchaos.com/
"We are at war with them. Neither in hatred nor revenge and wi
