Re: [gdal-dev] FW: Don't we have any ideas for GSoC 2017?

2017-03-01 Thread Even Rouault
On mercredi 1 mars 2017 11:43:12 CET Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Forwarding to the list because Jordan's trial was not successful. Sounds a good idea. I think potential students should be more pro-active in proposing and developing their own ideas. Regarding "indexing on VRT files", I guess

Re: [gdal-dev] FW: Don't we have any ideas for GSoC 2017?

2017-03-01 Thread Jan Hartmann
Hi all, What would you devs think of a project to add to the interpolation algorithms in gdal_grid, e.g. TPS. It's something I do now with R, but it would nice to have this native in Gdal. If you think this is a good idea, I could try to set up something from the University of Amsterdam

[gdal-dev] FW: Don't we have any ideas for GSoC 2017?

2017-03-01 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Forwarding to the list because Jordan's trial was not successful. Jordan Bess wrote: Re: [gdal-dev] Don't we have any ideas for GSoC 2017? Vector tiles! Mbtiles or folder of pbf It would be great if OGR supported creation of vector tiles in protocol buff format Get Outlook for