Thanks for explaining, Even. Makes sense to me.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 2:59 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Sean,
>
> This was the trend of the previous cycles. I see I also produced a 3.1.4
> at about the same time of 3.2.0. This offers 6 month of support for a given
> feature release. Otherwise
Sean,
This was the trend of the previous cycles. I see I also produced a 3.1.4
at about the same time of 3.2.0. This offers 6 month of support for a
given feature release. Otherwise that cuts it to 4 months.
Even
Le 28/04/2021 à 03:59, Sean Gillies a écrit :
Hi Even,
I see that there's
Hi Even,
I see that there's also a 3.2.3 candidate. Usually we discontinue the
previous minor version, right? Why in this case are we have a 3.3.0rc1 and
a 3.2.3rc1?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:57 AM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a GDAL/OGR 3.3.0 release candidate. The feedback
I can confirm that these scripts are indeed the samples that were moved,
Plus the arg_parser.py improvements file.
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, 20:20 Greg Troxel, wrote:
>
> I updated from beta1 to rc1. The transform issue appears fixed.
>
> In building python builds, I saw a large number of
I updated from beta1 to rc1. The transform issue appears fixed.
In building python builds, I saw a large number of differences from my
beta1 build and my rc1 build. I think this is the "esoteric scripts"
cleanup, but if antyhing in this diff seems off, let me know.
--- PLIST.beta 2021-04-25
Hi,
I have prepared a GDAL/OGR 3.3.0 release candidate. The feedback on beta1 was
useful to spot and fix a few bugs.
The changes between beta1 and RC1 are identified in:
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/commit/a882173d688e6042c9dc7b1b57d8d169b04abe2b
Note a potential impact on packaging recipees
