conflict (Julien Malik)
7. Re: RFC 31 - OGR 64bit Support (David Burken)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:24:56 -0500
From: Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL contouring problem
To: Ole
warmer...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL contouring problem
To: Ole Nielsen ole.niel...@aifdr.org
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org,
adeleb...@me.com adeleb...@me.com
Message-ID: 4cf32b18.2030...@pobox.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I am posting this again without test files attached due the 50K size limit.
Anyone who wants to see them, please contact me directly.
--
We have observed interesting anomaly with gdal_contour when one of the fixed
levels is zero.
If the zero contour is expressed as 0.0 (or indeed 0.)
Ole Nielsen wrote:
I am posting this again without test files attached due the 50K size
limit. Anyone who wants to see them, please contact me directly.
--
We have observed interesting anomaly with gdal_contour when one of the
fixed levels is zero.
If the zero contour is expressed as
Is there any reason not to include a heuristic that uses strtod() or
similar to test for the zeroness of the last argument?
-Francis Markham
On 29 November 2010 15:24, Frank Warmerdam warmer...@pobox.com wrote:
Ole Nielsen wrote:
I am posting this again without test files attached due the 50K
