Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL performance compared with libtiff

2015-09-09 Thread Immanuel Weber
Hi Even, thanks for your response. Okay, I see now.  If I would extend asTIFFTags variable of type GTIFFTags in geotiff.cpp, I should be able to use more of the tifftags, or am I wrong? Maybe I have to have a look at the type handling and some other places where the table is used too. I had

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL performance compared with libtiff

2015-09-08 Thread Immanuel Weber
Hi Even, sorry for not getting back earlier, I got distracted by other stuff to fix. Thanks for your reply. At the moment I will stick with your proposed way of writing with libtiff and adding geo data with gdal later, as I have to get that code running quickly. But I will try have a look at it

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL performance compared with libtiff

2015-09-08 Thread Even Rouault
Immanuel, > > sorry for not getting back earlier, I got distracted by other stuff to fix. > Thanks for your reply. At the moment I will stick with your proposed way of > writing with libtiff and adding geo data with gdal later, as I have to get > that code running quickly. But I will try have a

Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL performance compared with libtiff

2015-08-07 Thread Even Rouault
Le jeudi 06 août 2015 17:29:06, Immanuel Weber a écrit : Hi all, I'm working on an application where lots of images have to be written. Until now I'm using libtiff for that task. But as I want to add georeferencing and the like I'm having a look at GDAL right now. I did a quick evaluation

[gdal-dev] GDAL performance compared with libtiff

2015-08-06 Thread Immanuel Weber
Hi all, I'm working on an application where lots of images have to be written. Until now I'm using libtiff for that task. But as I want to add georeferencing and the like I'm having a look at GDAL right now. I did a quick evaluation of its performance related to libtiff and unfortunately it