Excellent! Really pleased this has g one through so quick
On 4 Aug 2016 6:38 p.m., "Kurt Schwehr" wrote:
> +1 for this change.
>
> This will be awesome!
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Even Rouault
> wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 04 August 2016
+1 for this change.
This will be awesome!
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:12 AM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> On Thursday 04 August 2016 12:11:18 Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
> > That's a very valuable improvement!
> > Thanks for that.
> >
> > Is there any future plan to backport it
That's a very valuable improvement!
Thanks for that.
Is there any future plan to backport it into 2.x series?
Regards,
Daniele
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 July 2016 17:00:51 Even Rouault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I move to
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 17:00:51 Even Rouault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I move to adopt RFC 63 : Sparse datasets improvements
>
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc63_sparse_datasets_improvements
>
> ---
>
> Starting with my +1
I declare this motion passed with +1 from DanielM and myself. The
On 2016-07-26 11:00 AM, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
I move to adopt RFC 63 : Sparse datasets improvements
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc63_sparse_datasets_improvements
---
Starting with my +1
Even
+1 on the overall idea and proposed solution.
+0 on the implementation details as
Hi,
I move to adopt RFC 63 : Sparse datasets improvements
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc63_sparse_datasets_improvements
---
Starting with my +1
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
___
gdal-dev